• Today: November 02, 2025

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Chembur Service Station

02 November, 2025
351
Bharat Petroleum v. Chembur Service Station (2011) — Nature of DPSL Licence | The Law Easy

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Chembur Service Station

2011(4) SCALE 209 • Supreme Court of India • DPSL Licence / CCRO Petrol Pump

Court: Supreme Court Year: 2011 Citation: 2011(4) SCALE 209 Area: Commercial/Property Reading: ~7 min Jurisdiction: India
Hero image for DPSL licence and CCRO petrol pump case
Author: Gulzar Hashmi Published: 01 Nov 2025 Location: India
```

Quick Summary

This case explains what a DPSL licence means in a company-controlled petrol pump (CCRO). The dealer is licensed only to sell the company’s fuel using the company’s premises and equipment.

If supply stops or the licence ends, the dealer has no right to enter or use the outlet. The Supreme Court allowed BPCL’s appeal and protected its possession of the outlet.

Issues

  • What is the nature and scope of the licence under the DPSL agreement granted to the dealer?

Rules

  • Licences differ in width. Some almost resemble leases; others are very narrow—like a right to enter only for a limited use.
  • A DPSL licence tied to the licensor’s goods and equipment ends when supply ends; entry/use cannot continue for other purposes.
  • In CCROs, the licensor (company) owns/leases the site and equipment; the dealer only sells the licensor’s products.

Facts (Timeline)

1971: Burmah Shell leases ~680 sq. yds at Chembur, Mumbai, to set up a depot/service station and installs pumps, tanks, and equipment.
1972: DPSL agreement appoints the respondent as dealer to sell the company’s products from the outlet.
1976: Undertaking vests in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. under the 1976 Act.
1995: Fresh DPSL executed with the respondent firm after a partner’s death.
2007: QC inspection notes short delivery on one dispensing unit during checks.
Context: Equipment and premises are company-owned/controlled; the dealer’s role is to sell only BPCL products.
Dispute: On stoppage/termination, the dealer claims a right to continue on the premises; BPCL asserts licence ends with the product supply.
Timeline of BPCL v. Chembur Service Station events

Arguments

Appellant (BPCL)

  • Licence is narrow and tied to sale of BPCL products using BPCL equipment.
  • If sale stops, the dealer’s right to enter/use premises ends.
  • Company remains entitled to possession and to exclude the dealer.

Respondent (Dealer)

  • Licence should be treated broadly, akin to possessory rights.
  • Sought status quo to continue access to the outlet premises.

Judgment

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal.

  • Orders directing status quo were set aside.
  • BPCL could continue in possession of the outlet and use it for its business.
  • BPCL could lawfully prevent the dealer from entering the premises.
  • Ruling applies to CCRO models where premises and equipment are company-owned/leased.
Judgment outcome illustration for BPCL v. Chembur Service Station

Ratio Decidendi

Where a licence is restricted to selling the licensor’s products using the licensor’s site and equipment, it is not a possessory right. On stoppage of supply or termination, the dealer’s entry/use ends; the company need not sue for “possession”.

Why It Matters

  • Clarifies the limits of dealership licences in CCRO petrol pumps.
  • Helps draft agreements that clearly define entry and use rights.
  • Guides courts on possession vs. licence in company-controlled outlets.

Key Takeaways

  1. DPSL in a CCRO is a limited, purpose-bound licence.
  2. Stopping supply ends the dealer’s right to enter/use the outlet.
  3. Company need not file a separate possession suit to exclude the dealer.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “SELL–SITE–STOP”

  • SELL: Licence is only to sell licensor’s fuel.
  • SITE: Premises and equipment belong to the licensor (CCRO).
  • STOP: When supply stops, entry/use stops.

IRAC Outline

Issue

What is the legal character of the DPSL licence at a CCRO petrol pump?

Rule

Licences vary; a CCRO DPSL is a narrow, purpose-based licence tied to the licensor’s products and equipment.

Application

Dealer sold only BPCL products using BPCL site/equipment; on supply stoppage, no right to stay or use the outlet.

Conclusion

Appeal allowed; BPCL retains possession and can exclude the dealer.

Glossary

DPSL Agreement
Dispensing Pump and Selling Licence—dealer sells the company’s fuel from company-controlled premises.
CCRO
Company Controlled Retail Outlet—site and equipment owned/leased by the oil company.
Licence vs Possession
Licence gives limited use for a purpose; possession implies control and broader rights.

FAQs

No. A DPSL licence is purpose-bound and narrow. It lets the dealer sell the licensor’s fuel; it does not give possession like a lease.

The dealer’s right to enter and use the outlet ends. The company can retain possession and exclude the dealer.

No. The Court clarified it applies to CCROs where the licensor owns/leases the premises and equipment.

It was part of the factual setting that led to action. But the key legal point is the limited nature of the DPSL licence.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
```
© 2025 The Law Easy • All rights reserved.

Comment

Nothing for now