M.C. Chaganlal Sowear v. P. Anantaraman & Anr. (1961)
Is interest under a mortgage also a charge on the property for redemption?
Quick Summary
This case fixes a simple rule for redemption: unless the mortgage deed clearly says otherwise, interest due is also charged on the mortgaged property. So, to redeem, the mortgagor must pay the mortgage money—which includes principal and interest.
Issues
- Can the mortgagee treat interest as a charge on the mortgaged property in the absence of a contrary contract?
Rules
Transfer of Property Act, 1882
- Section 58(a): Defines mortgage and the idea of securing payment of a debt (principal + interest).
- Section 60: Right of redemption—mortgagor can redeem by paying the mortgage money due under the deed (normally principal + interest and other sums, unless contracted otherwise).
Facts (Timeline)
Arguments
Appellant (Mortgagee)
- Redemption requires payment of mortgage money (principal + interest + sums due).
- Interest is charged on the property unless deed says otherwise.
- District Judge was right to remand for full amount ascertainment.
Respondent (Purchaser/Mortgagor)
- Offered principal; interest should not block redemption.
- Deed and conduct allow redemption on principal alone.
- Supports Trial Court’s decree.
Judgment
The Madras High Court allowed the appeal. It held that the District Judge’s reading of the mortgage deed was correct and there was no contract to the contrary excluding interest as a charge. Therefore, interest payable formed part of the mortgage money to be cleared before redemption. The order of remand to ascertain the actual amount due (including interest etc.) was restored.
Ratio Decidendi
In mortgage law, interest is ordinarily part of the security and is charged on the mortgaged property along with principal. Unless the deed clearly shows a different bargain, redemption requires payment of the entire mortgage money (principal + interest and other due sums).
Why It Matters
- Clarifies exam-favourite point: interest travels with the security.
- Shows how courts handle right of redemption under TPA s.60.
- Emphasises drafting: to exclude interest as charge, deed must say so clearly.
Key Takeaways
- Default rule: principal + interest must be paid to redeem.
- A contrary contract must be explicit; silence favours the default.
- Courts may remand to compute the actual amount due.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook
Mnemonic: “PIC to Redeem” — Principal + Interest = Consideration to redeem.
- Probe the Deed: Any clear clause excluding interest as charge?
- Include Interest: If no exclusion, add interest to the mortgage money.
- Compute & Pay: Ascertain full dues; redemption follows payment.
IRAC Outline
Issue: Whether interest under the mortgage is also a charge on the property and must be paid for redemption.
Rule: Under TPA ss.58(a), 60, mortgage money generally includes principal + interest unless a contrary contract exists.
Application: Deed did not exclude interest as charge; mortgagee entitled to insist on full dues; lower court’s principal-only approach was incorrect.
Conclusion: Appeal allowed; remand to fix the actual amount due (including interest).
Glossary
- Mortgage Money
- Total sum due under the mortgage—usually principal + interest + agreed sums.
- Charge
- A security interest over property for payment of money (here, interest as part of security).
- Right of Redemption
- Mortgagor’s right to reclaim property by paying the mortgage money (TPA s.60).
FAQs
Can parties exclude interest as a charge?
Yes, but the deed must say so clearly. Courts will not infer exclusion.
If principal is tendered, must the mortgagee accept?
Not if interest and other sums are still due under the deed and law.
Why did the Court order a remand?
To compute the actual dues (including interest etc.) before granting redemption.
Related Cases
- Cases on scope of redemption under TPA s.60.
- Decisions on computation of “mortgage money”.
Share
Related Post
Tags
Archive
Popular & Recent Post
Comment
Nothing for now