Naresh Kavarachand Khatri v. State of Gujarat
(2008) 8 SCC 300 • Limits on High Court power to transfer investigation at the start.
naresh-kavarachand-khatri-v-state-of-gujarat
Quick Summary
This case sets a simple rule: at the start of a case, police choose the police station that investigates. A High Court should not quickly shift the investigation to another station without clear reasons. The Supreme Court corrected such a transfer here and restored the proper jurisdiction.
Issues
- Can a High Court, at the initial stage, transfer an investigation from one police station to another?
Rules
- Section 156, CrPC, 1973: Police control investigation of cognizable offences, including allocation to the proper police station.
- Courts should avoid interference at the start, and must give reasons if they ever step in.
Facts (Timeline)
Arguments
Appellant
- Vadodara had territorial links; investigation already started there.
- HC gave no reasons; complainant not heard; transfer harms fairness.
- Section 156 CrPC vests investigation control in police, not courts.
Respondent
- Sought change of police station by court order.
- Implied concerns about impartiality at Vadodara (not backed by reasons on record).
Judgment
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal. It held that the High Court acted in undue haste and without reasons. The transfer order was set aside. As a result, the investigation and charge sheets filed at Waghodia lost jurisdictional validity.
Ratio Decidendi
Investigation lies with the police under Section 156 CrPC. A High Court should not transfer an investigation at the outset unless there are compelling reasons noted on record and jurisdiction is carefully verified.
Why It Matters
- Protects the separation of roles: police investigate, courts supervise lawfully.
- Prevents forum shopping and arbitrary shifts of cases between police stations.
- Stresses the need for reasons and jurisdiction checks before court interference.
Key Takeaways
- Police choose the station: CrPC 156.
- High Court transfers at the start are exceptional, not routine.
- Orders must show reasons; hear necessary parties.
- Territorial links matter for police station jurisdiction.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook
Mnemonic: “POLICE FIRST, COURT LATER”
- Who? Police own investigation (S.156).
- When? Court steps in only with strong reasons.
- Where? Check territorial nexus before any transfer.
IRAC Outline
Issue
Can the High Court transfer investigation between police stations at the initial stage?
Rule
Section 156 CrPC vests investigation in police; court interference is limited and reason-bound.
Application
HC shifted case from Vadodara to Waghodia without reasons or hearing the complainant; territorial link to Vadodara existed.
Conclusion
Transfer order quashed; Waghodia investigation/charge sheets lost jurisdiction; appeal allowed.
Glossary
- Section 156 CrPC
- Police power to investigate cognizable offences and decide the station.
- Jurisdiction
- Legal power of a court/police station over a case or area.
- Cognizable Offence
- Offence where police can register FIR and investigate without court order.
FAQs
Related Cases
Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P.
Explains remedies when investigation is improper; emphasises magistrate’s powers over investigation supervision.
State of W.B. v. CPDR (2010)
On High Court’s constitutional power to order CBI probe in rare cases with strong reasons.
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
Classic guide on when courts may quash FIRs/interfere—exceptional categories only.
Share
Related Post
Tags
Archive
Popular & Recent Post
Comment
Nothing for now