Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr
Citation: LL 2021 SC 124
Quick Summary
Indian buyers paid foreign suppliers for computer software. The tax department called it “royalty” and asked for TDS under Section 195. The Supreme Court said these are not royalty payments when there is no transfer of copyright. They are sales of copyrighted articles or limited-use licences that do not create taxable income in India under the Act read with the DTAA. So, no TDS is required.
Issues
- Are sums paid by Indian enterprises to use foreign software taxable as royalty under the Act and DTAA?
- Did Section 195 require the payer to deduct tax at source on such payments?
Rules
- Payment for off-the-shelf software or for a limited, non-exclusive use does not transfer copyright.
- Where income is not chargeable in India under Section 9 read with Section 4 and the DTAA, Section 195 TDS does not apply.
- Character depends on the agreement: copyright right vs. copyrighted article.
Income-tax Act, 1961 • DTAA interpretation
Facts (Timeline)
Arguments
Appellant (Assessees)
- Only a limited, non-exclusive user licence was given; no copyright passed.
- Payments are for a copyrighted article; not “royalty” under DTAA.
- No income is chargeable in India; hence no TDS u/s 195.
Respondent (Revenue)
- Licence equals use of copyright; therefore, royalty arises.
- Payments accrue in India; TDS u/s 195 is mandatory.
- Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi) covers such transactions.
Judgment
The Supreme Court allowed the appeals. It grouped the transactions into four categories and held for the assessees in each:
- Non-resident sells software directly to Indian end-user.
- Non-resident sells to Indian distributor (this appellant’s category).
- Non-resident sells to foreign distributor for resale to Indian end-users.
- Software bundled with hardware sold to Indian distributors/end-users.
In all, the payments were not royalty. Without taxable income in India, Section 195 TDS does not apply.
Ratio (Core Principle)
A copyrighted article sale or a limited user licence does not transfer copyright. Such payments are not “royalty” under the Act/DTAA; no TDS u/s 195 when income is not chargeable in India.
Why It Matters
- Clarity for cross-border software deals and compliance.
- Aligns Indian practice with DTAA language on royalty.
- Reduces disputes on shrink-wrapped/OEM/licence software payments.
Key Takeaways
- Not royalty if no copyright rights are transferred.
- DTAA prevails where more beneficial to the assessee.
- No TDS u/s 195 if the sum isn’t chargeable in India.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook
Mnemonic: “SOFT—NO ROYALTY”
- SOFTware is a copyrighted article, not the copyright itself.
- NO income chargeable in India ⇒ no TDS.
- ROYALTY? Only if copyright rights are actually transferred.
IRAC Outline
Issue: Are software payments to non-residents royalty? Is TDS u/s 195 required?
Rule: No royalty without transfer of copyright; DTAA governs chargeability.
Application: Agreements gave only limited, non-exclusive use; no copyright parted; hence no taxable income in India.
Conclusion: Payments not royalty; no TDS u/s 195; appeals allowed.
Glossary
- Royalty
- Payment for use of or right to use a copyright, patent, etc.
- DTAA
- Treaty to avoid double taxation and define taxing rights.
- Section 195
- Provision requiring TDS on sums chargeable to tax in India paid to non-residents.
Student FAQs
Related Cases
Share
Tags
Archive
Popular & Recent Post
Comment
Nothing for now