• Today: November 11, 2025

Topandas v. State of Bombay (1956)

01 January, 1970
1501
Topandas v. State of Bombay (1956) — Criminal Conspiracy Needs Two or More | The Law Easy

Topandas v. State of Bombay (1956)

Supreme Court of India 1956 Bhagwati, Venkatarama Ayyar, B.P. Sinha, JJ. Criminal Law • Evidence ~6 min read

Author: Gulzar Hashmi  •  Location: India  •  Publish Date: 05-Sep-2024

Tags: Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Courtroom illustration for Topandas v. State of Bombay

Quick Summary

This case settles a simple rule: no conspiracy without company. Criminal conspiracy under the IPC needs an agreement between at least two persons. If the other alleged conspirators are acquitted, the lone accused cannot be convicted for conspiracy.

Issues

  • Can the accused be convicted under IPC 120B when the others alleged to be conspirators stand acquitted?

Rules

  • IPC 120A (Definition): Criminal conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to do an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means.
  • IPC 120B (Punishment): Follows the above definition—without two or more, the offence is not made out.
  • Supporting view: Gulab Singh v. Emperor (1916)—“there cannot be a conspiracy of one.”
  • Other charges involved: IPC 471 r/w 465 & 34; IPC 420 r/w 34 (background to the appeal).

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline for Topandas v. State of Bombay
Allegations: Accused 1–4 were charged with criminal conspiracy to commit certain illegal acts.
Additional charges: IPC 471 r/w 465 & 34 and IPC 420 r/w 34 were also pressed.
Trial outcome (Magistrate, Bombay): All accused were acquitted.
State appeal (Bombay High Court): Acquittal of Accused 1 was reversed; acquittals of Accused 2–4 were confirmed.
Supreme Court: Special leave to appeal was sought against the High Court’s reversal for Accused 1.

Arguments

Appellant

  • With others acquitted, there is no second person to form the necessary agreement.
  • By the text of IPC 120A, one person alone cannot be guilty of conspiracy.
  • Therefore, conviction under IPC 120B cannot stand.

Respondent (State)

  • The record supports involvement of Accused 1 in a plan to commit illegal acts.
  • The High Court rightly reversed the acquittal for Accused 1.
  • Other charges provide context to the unlawful agreement.

Judgment

Judgment illustration for Topandas case

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction for conspiracy. It held that the definition in IPC 120A demands an agreement of two or more persons. With the other alleged conspirators acquitted, there was no one left to agree with the remaining accused. Hence, IPC 120B could not apply.

Bench: Justice N.H. Bhagwati, Justice T.L. Venkatarama Ayyar, Justice B.P. Sinha.

Ratio Decidendi

  • Conspiracy = agreement of at least two persons (IPC 120A).
  • If co-accused are acquitted, a sole accused cannot be convicted for conspiracy.
  • Courts should align conviction under 120B with the definition’s core element—plurality of actors.

Why It Matters

This decision is a go-to citation for conspiracy questions. It draws a clear boundary: suspicious conduct by one person may attract other offences, but not conspiracy unless another person’s agreement is proved.

Key Takeaways

  • No solo conspiracy: at least two persons must agree.
  • Acquittal of alleged partners can collapse a 120B charge.
  • Check the definition first before applying the punishment section.
  • Use this case to tackle trick MCQs and mains questions on IPC 120A/120B.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “Conspiracy Needs Company.”

  1. Spot the agreement—are there 2+ persons?
  2. Strip away acquitted co-accused—does any partner remain?
  3. Stop at 120B if the answer is “no partner”.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Can a person be convicted for conspiracy when all others alleged to be part of the plan are acquitted?

Rule

IPC 120A requires an agreement of two or more persons; 120B punishes only what 120A defines.

Application

Other alleged conspirators stood acquitted; no second person remained to form the agreement.

Conclusion

Conviction under 120B cannot stand; appeal allowed for Accused 1.

Glossary

Criminal Conspiracy
Agreement by two or more persons to do an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means (IPC 120A).
Read With (r/w)
A way to link sections to show how they operate together in a charge.
Acquittal
A finding that the accused is not guilty of the charge.

FAQs

One person alone cannot be guilty of criminal conspiracy. With others acquitted, 120B could not apply to the lone accused.

Besides 120A/120B, charges included IPC 471 read with 465 and 34, and IPC 420 read with 34.

Justice N.H. Bhagwati, Justice T.L. Venkatarama Ayyar, and Justice B.P. Sinha.

Gulab Singh v. Emperor (1916) — it stressed that there cannot be a conspiracy of one.

Start with the definition in 120A (needs 2+ persons). Then apply: if co-accused are acquitted, 120B fails against the lone accused.

Meta & SEO

  • CASE_TITLE: Topandas v. State of Bombay (1956)
  • PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: criminal conspiracy; IPC 120A; IPC 120B; two or more persons
  • SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: IPC 420; IPC 465; IPC 471; IPC 34; Bombay High Court; Supreme Court 1956
  • PUBLISH_DATE: 05-Sep-2024
  • AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi
  • LOCATION: India
  • Slug: topandas-v-state-of-bombay-1956
  • isPartOf: The Law Easy

Criminal Law Evidence IPC

Reviewed by The Law Easy

```

Comment

Nothing for now