• Today: January 09, 2026

Reema Aggarwal v. Anupam and Ors (2004)

01 January, 1970
5701
Reema Aggarwal v. Anupam and Ors (2004) — Section 498A & 304B apply without valid marriage | The Law Easy

Reema Aggarwal v. Anupam and Ors (2004)

Sections 498A & 304B IPC apply even without a valid marriage if the man acted as husband and subjected the woman to cruelty.

Supreme Court of India 2004 Pasayat & Raju, JJ. IPC · Dowry ~5 min (2004) SCC
Illustration for Reema Aggarwal v. Anupam (2004) case
```
```
```

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court said that Section 498A (cruelty) and Section 304B (dowry death) of the IPC can apply even if the woman is not a “legally wedded” wife.

If a man assumes the role of a husband, lives like one, and the woman faces cruelty or dowry harassment, the law protects her.

The Court used the mischief rule to stop dowry-related abuse from escaping on technical grounds.

Issues

  • Does Section 304B IPC (dowry death) apply when the couple’s marriage is not legally valid (second/void marriage)?
  • Can Section 498A IPC protect a woman in a marital-like relationship against cruelty by the “husband” and his relatives?

Rules

Section 498A IPC

Targets cruelty by husband or his relatives. The focus is on cruelty, not only on the formality of a valid marriage.

Section 304B IPC

Dowry death within 7 years of marriage, linked to dowry harassment. Interpreted to prevent escape through technical invalidity.

Bigamy (Section 494 IPC) needs a valid second marriage to prosecute. But that standard does not control 498A/304B because their thrust is different.

Facts (Timeline)

Case facts timeline

13 Jul 1998

Appellant admitted to Tagore Hospital after consuming poison. Police sought medical fitness to record statement.

Statement

She said she was married to Anupam. She faced cruelty by him and his family for dowry.

Second Marriage

Both sides disclosed it was a second marriage.

Chargesheet

Filed under Sections 307 & 498A IPC.

Trial Court

Held 498A not made out as first marriage of R-1 not dissolved; 307 also not made out.

High Court

Affirmed Trial Court. Appeal dismissed.

Supreme Court

Set the correct legal position on 498A/304B in marital-like relationships.

Arguments

Appellant

  • Cruelty and dowry harassment were continuous.
  • Technical invalidity of marriage should not defeat protection.
  • Law must target the social evil, not formalities.

Respondents

  • Relied on Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande to stress valid second marriage for bigamy.
  • Argued that without a lawful marriage, 498A/304B cannot apply.

Judgment

Judgment illustration

The Supreme Court drew a line between Section 494 IPC (bigamy) and Sections 498A/304B IPC.

  • Section 494 focuses on the act of marrying again and needs a valid second marriage.
  • Sections 498A/304B focus on cruelty and dowry death. These must be read to stop the mischief, even if the marriage is void.

Hence, a man who holds himself out as husband and exercises such authority can be covered as “husband” for 498A/304B.

Ratio Decidendi

The word “husband” in Sections 498A/304B IPC is read liberally to include a man who has undertaken the role of a husband in a marital-like relationship. The mischief rule justifies this reading to prevent dowry-related cruelty and death from going unpunished.

Why It Matters

  • Protects women in second or void marriages from dowry cruelty.
  • Closes a gap that offenders used to avoid liability.
  • Shifts focus from form to substance: safety over technicalities.

Key Takeaways

498A/304B protect women even without a valid marriage.
“Husband” includes a man who acts as one and exercises such authority.
Bigamy (S.494) ≠ Cruelty/Dowry Death (S.498A/304B): different aims.
Used the mischief rule to curb dowry abuse.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “HUSBAND in ACT”

  • HUS: HUsbands by Status (even if void)
  • BAND: He binds himself as husband; assumes role
  • ACT: Law targets the act—cruelty/dowry, not ceremony

3-Step Hook:

  1. Spot a marital-like relationship.
  2. Check cruelty/dowry harassment evidence.
  3. Apply 498A/304B—do not get stuck on validity.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Do 498A/304B apply if the marriage is not legally valid?

Rule

Interpret “husband” broadly; target cruelty/dowry mischief.

Application

Man acted as husband; authority exercised; cruelty alleged—498A/304B attracted.

Conclusion

Yes. Protection extends to such relationships to prevent injustice.

Glossary

Mischief Rule (Heydon’s)
Interpret law to cure the problem the statute aims to fix.
Dowry Death (S.304B)
Death of a woman within 7 years of marriage linked to dowry harassment.
Cruelty (S.498A)
Any wilful conduct likely to drive a woman to suicide or cause grave injury; includes harassment for dowry.

FAQs

498A/304B protect women in marital-like relationships, even without a valid marriage.

No. Bigamy (S.494) still needs a valid second marriage. This case deals with cruelty and dowry death, not the offence of bigamy.

To stop offenders from using technical invalidity of marriage to escape punishment for dowry cruelty.

State the issue, separate 494 from 498A/304B, cite mischief rule, conclude that protection applies despite invalid marriage.
```

Comment

Nothing for now