• Today: November 04, 2025

Peskin v. Anderson

04 November, 2025
1851
Peskin v. Anderson (2001) — Directors’ Duties Explained: To Whom Do Directors Owe Duties?

Peskin v. Anderson (2001) 1 BCLC 372

Directors’ Duties • Company vs. Members • Assumption of Responsibility

Court of Appeal (EW) 2001 1 BCLC 372 Company & Corporate Governance ~6 min India
Hero image for Peskin v. Anderson case explainer

Quick Summary

Directors usually owe duties only to the company. Shareholders cannot claim a general fiduciary duty from directors. A duty to specific shareholders may arise only in special facts where directors assume responsibility and shareholders rely on it.

  • Main rule: Duty is to the company.
  • Exception: Clear assumption of responsibility to certain members.
  • Result here: No special duty was shown; the claim failed.

Issues

  1. Do directors owe fiduciary duties to individual shareholders under English law?
  2. When does an assumption of responsibility create a duty to members?

Rules

  • Directors are fiduciaries of the company, not of members as a class.
  • A shareholder-focused duty arises only from special facts—clear responsibility taken by directors and reliance by those members.

Think “company first”; look for facts that show a targeted duty to members.

Facts (Timeline)

View Timeline
Former RAC members sued directors for not disclosing plans to demutualise.
They said: “If we had stayed members, we would have gained about £35,000.”
Directors asked to strike out: no duty owed to individual members.
First instance (Neuberger J): claims dismissed. Members appealed.
Court of Appeal: appeal dismissed; no special assumption of responsibility shown.

Arguments

Appellants (Former Members)

  • Directors should have told members about demutualisation plans.
  • Not telling caused financial loss to those who left.
  • Directors owed a duty to them on these facts.

Respondents (Directors)

  • Duties are owed to the company, not to members in general.
  • No assumption of responsibility to these individuals.
  • Therefore, no fiduciary duty or duty to disclose arose.

Judgment

Appeal dismissed. The Court of Appeal held that directors do not ordinarily owe fiduciary duties to shareholders. No special facts proved an assumed responsibility to the former members.

  • Default: duty to company.
  • No special duty established on the evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

Directors are not agents or trustees of shareholders. A fiduciary duty to members arises only from special circumstances showing a clear assumption of responsibility and reliance.

Why It Matters

  • Clarifies the boundary of directors’ duties.
  • Guides claims by members—look for special facts, not general duty.
  • Helps boards manage disclosure and communication risks.

Key Takeaways

  • Duty runs to the company, not to members as a group.
  • Member-focused duty needs assumption of responsibility + reliance.
  • Non-disclosure to members is not automatically a breach.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “COMPANY-FIRST EXCEPT”

  1. COMPANY — fiduciary duty to the company.
  2. FIRST — members come second by default.
  3. EXCEPT — special facts = assumed responsibility to members.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Do directors owe duties to shareholders, and did such a duty arise here?

Rule

Fiduciary duty is to the company; special duty to members needs assumed responsibility + reliance.

Application

No facts showed targeted advice or responsibility to the former members; mere non-disclosure was not enough.

Conclusion

No special duty; appeal dismissed.

Glossary

Fiduciary Duty
A duty of loyalty and good faith owed by directors to the company.
Assumption of Responsibility
Directors take on a special role toward specific members, creating a duty.
Demutualisation
Changing from a mutual organisation to a company with shareholders.

FAQs

No. The default duty is to the company. Shareholders need special facts showing a duty to them.

Targeted advice, direct communications, or conduct showing directors took responsibility for specific members’ interests.

No. Without an assumed responsibility to those members, non-disclosure did not create liability.
Judgment illustration for Peskin v. Anderson

Comment

Nothing for now