World Phone India Pvt. Ltd v. WPI Group Inc USA, (2013) 178 Comp Cas 173
Delhi High Court
2013
178 Comp Cas 173
Company Law / Corporate Governance
~6 min read
Author: Gulzar Hashmi |
India |
Published:
PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: shareholders agreement; Articles of Association; affirmative vote
SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: AoA silent; board resolution; rights issue; corporate governance; Delhi High Court
Slug:
world-phone-v-wpi
Quick Summary
The Court drew a simple line: a shareholders agreement (JVA/SHA) may bind the parties, but it does not bind the company unless the clause is placed inside the Articles of Association (AoA). If the AoA is silent about an “affirmative vote”, the company cannot be forced to follow it.
- AoA rules first: Company actions must follow the AoA.
- SHA clauses: To bind the company, insert them into the AoA via proper alteration.
- Outcome: Challenge based on “affirmative vote” failed because AoA had no such clause.
Issues
- Can an agreement clause (affirmative vote) apply when the AoA does not contain it?
- Does a shareholders agreement, by itself, control company decisions?
Rules
- Binding effect: Where the AoA is silent, a clause in a shareholders agreement is not binding on the company unless it is incorporated into the AoA.
- Company law logic: The AoA is the company’s internal rulebook. Agreements outside the AoA cannot override it.
Facts (Timeline)
- Shareholding: WPIPL owned by WPI Group (43.75%), Vivek Dhir (43.75%), Pankaj Patel (12.5%).
- 22 Sep: Mr. Pankaj’s shares transferred to Mr. Vivek Dhir and Mrs. Malini Dhir; Mrs. Dhir becomes Additional Director.
- 31 Oct: Board approves rights issue of 1,49,303 shares per AoA. Mr. Aditya Ahluwalia (WPI) is abroad; absent from meeting.
- Effect: WPI chairman becomes a minority stakeholder.
- Challenge: Meeting validity attacked citing Clause 6.2 of JVA giving Mr. Ahluwalia an affirmative vote.
Arguments
Appellant’s Side
- Board acted under AoA; no AoA clause on affirmative vote.
- JVA cannot control the company unless reflected in AoA.
- Rights issue approval is valid despite a director’s absence.
Respondent’s Side
- JVA Clause 6.2 grants Mr. Ahluwalia an affirmative vote on all matters.
- Decision without his vote is invalid and oppressive.
- Company must honour the agreement terms between shareholders.
Judgment
The Court held that a shareholders agreement clause—even if not illegal and not inconsistent with the Act—cannot be enforced against the company unless it is written into the AoA. Since the AoA had no “affirmative vote” provision, the challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi
Company decisions flow from the AoA. A shareholders agreement binds the signatories inter se, but it binds the company only when its terms are incorporated into the AoA.
Why It Matters
- Clarifies how to make veto/affirmative vote rights enforceable—put them in the AoA.
- Prevents confusion between private contracts and the company’s constitution.
- Key citation for exam answers on SHA vs AoA conflicts.
Key Takeaways
- AoA Rules The AoA is the first point of reference for corporate acts.
- Incorporate Insert SHA clauses into AoA to bind the company.
- No Shortcut Silence in AoA means the SHA clause does not apply to the company.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook
Mnemonic: “A-O-A = A-OK” — If it’s in the AoA, you’re A-OK to enforce it on the company.
- Spot contract rights (affirmative vote, veto, quorum).
- Check AoA for the same clause.
- Act by amending AoA if missing; else, clause won’t bind the company.
IRAC Outline
| Issue | Is an affirmative vote in a shareholders agreement binding when the AoA is silent? |
|---|---|
| Rule | SHA clauses bind the company only if incorporated into the AoA. |
| Application | AoA had no affirmative vote clause; board acted per AoA; JVA could not override AoA. |
| Conclusion | Challenge fails; company not bound by the JVA clause absent in AoA. |
Glossary
- Articles of Association (AoA)
- The company’s internal rulebook that governs management and powers.
- Shareholders Agreement (SHA/JVA)
- A contract between shareholders; it binds them but not the company unless reflected in the AoA.
- Affirmative Vote
- Special right to approve key decisions; effective against the company only if in the AoA.
FAQs
No. The AoA controls company actions. SHA clauses need to be in the AoA to bind the company.
Then the company is not bound by that SHA clause. Alter the AoA if you want it enforceable.
No. They bind shareholders among themselves. To bind the company, mirror them in the AoA.
Not by itself. Validity depends on AoA, quorum, and law—not on a private SHA right unless in AoA.
Popular & Recent Post
Comment
Nothing for now