• Today: November 04, 2025

Chandrakant Khaire v. Dr. Shantaram Kale

04 November, 2025
1551
Chandrakant Khaire v. Shantaram Kale (1989) – Adjournment vs Suspension Explained | The Law Easy

Chandrakant Khaire v. Dr. Shantaram Kale & Ors. (1989) 65 Comp Cas 121 (SC)

Supreme Court of India 1989 65 Comp Cas 121 Municipal / Meeting Procedure ~6 min read
Author: Gulzar Hashmi  |  India  |  Published:
Hero image for Chandrakant Khaire v. Shantaram Kale: adjournment vs suspension

PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: adjournment; suspension; sine die; first meeting SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: Section 6(2); Rule 1(h); Aurangabad Municipal Corporation; meeting procedure Slug: chandrakant-khaire-v-shantaram-kale

Quick Summary

The first meeting turned chaotic. The Commissioner paused it and later resumed it the same day after order returned. The Supreme Court held this was a suspension, not an adjournment for the day or sine die. Elections held later that day were valid.

  • Rule: First meeting must be held as convened; only a pause is allowed to restore order.
  • Adjourn ≠ Suspend: Adjourn shifts to another time/day; suspension is a short pause the same day.
  • Quorum can act if Chairman takes any course other than a proper suspension.

Issues

  1. Was the first corporation meeting adjourned for the day, adjourned sine die, or just suspended?
  2. Could the Commissioner “postpone” the first meeting to another day under Section 6(2)?

Rules

  • Rule 1(h) – Powers of Chairman: May suspend proceedings to restore order; must inform the house as far as possible.
  • Section 6(2): The first meeting, once properly convened, cannot be shifted to another day or adjourned sine die.
  • Definitions: “Adjourned for the day”, “adjourned sine die”, and “proceedings suspended” are different in effect and timing.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline for Chandrakant Khaire v. Shantaram Kale
  • 6 May 1983, 2:00 pm: Inaugural meeting of Aurangabad Municipal Corporation begins.
  • 2:30 pm: Elections for Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Standing Committee set to start; disruption by opposition.
  • ~4:30 pm: Commissioner indicates the meeting will continue once order is restored.
  • 5:15 pm: Protest filed claiming the meeting stood “postponed for the day.”
  • Respondents later declared elected as Mayor and Deputy Mayor; writ filed challenging validity.
  • High Court upholds that the meeting was only suspended and resumed the same day; special leave sought.

Arguments

Appellant

  • Commissioner had “postponed for the day”; later sitting was illegal.
  • First meeting cannot be revived once postponed beyond the day.

Respondents

  • There was only a temporary suspension to restore order.
  • Resumption the same day kept the meeting valid; elections proper.

Judgment

The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court. The first meeting was not adjourned for the day or sine die; it was only suspended and later continued the same day. Elections were valid. Special leave was refused; no costs.

Judgment highlight: suspension vs adjournment validated

Ratio Decidendi

In a properly convened first meeting, the presiding officer may suspend proceedings to restore order and resume the same day. He cannot unilaterally adjourn it to another day or sine die. If he acts otherwise, a quorum may proceed with scheduled business.

Why It Matters

  • Clarifies the Chair’s limited powers at an inaugural sitting.
  • Prevents misuse of “postponement” to derail first-meeting business.
  • Guides municipal bodies on handling disorder without breaking legality.

Key Takeaways

  • Suspend, Not Shift A pause to restore order is lawful; moving the day is not.
  • Quorum Power If Chair exceeds power, quorum may continue business.
  • Clear Terms “Adjourn”, “sine die”, and “suspend” have distinct meanings.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “S-A-S”Suspend to restore order, not Adjourn the day, resume Same day.

  1. Spot disorder at an inaugural meeting.
  2. State a brief suspension; inform members.
  3. Sit again the same day and finish business.

IRAC Outline

Issue Was the first meeting adjourned (day/sine die) or merely suspended due to disorder?
Rule Section 6(2), Rule 1(h): First meeting cannot be shifted to another day; only suspension to restore order is permitted.
Application The Commissioner paused and resumed the meeting the same day; no decision to adjourn for the day or sine die.
Conclusion Proceedings were valid; later elections that day stand. Special leave refused; no costs.

Glossary

Adjournment
To move the meeting to a later time/day; if indefinite, it is adjourned sine die.
Suspension
A short pause during the same day to restore peace and order.
Quorum
Minimum members required for valid proceedings; may continue if Chair acts beyond power.

FAQs

No. Once properly convened, it must be held that day. Only a suspension is allowed to restore order.

Members forming a quorum may continue and transact the scheduled business lawfully.

As long as reasonably needed to restore peace and order, with the house informed as far as possible.
Reviewed by The Law Easy Municipal Law Procedure Local Governance
Back to Top

Comment

Nothing for now