• Today: October 31, 2025

Bhagat Ram v. Teja Singh (AIR 2002 SC 1)

31 October, 2025
201
Bhagat Ram v. Teja Singh (AIR 2002 SC 1) — Female Heir Succession & Section 15(2)(a) | The Law Easy

Bhagat Ram v. Teja Singh (AIR 2002 SC 1)

How Sections 15(2)(a) and 14 of the Hindu Succession Act decide a Hindu woman’s property and who inherits it.

Supreme Court of India 2002 AIR 2002 SC 1 Hindu Succession ~7 min read
Section 15(2)(a) HSA Section 14 HSA Female succession
Illustration: devolution of a Hindu woman’s property under Section 15(2)(a)
```
Author: Gulzar Hashmi  |  Location: India  |  Published: 31 Oct 2025
```
```

Quick Summary

CASE_TITLE Bhagat Ram v. Teja Singh, AIR 2002 SC 1

The Supreme Court clarified how a Hindu woman’s property devolves on her death. If she inherited it from her father or mother, then in the absence of her own children or grandchildren, it passes to the heirs of her father (Section 15(2)(a)). Section 14 confirms she holds property as an absolute owner. Even so, the special rule in Section 15(2) can still decide who inherits after her.

Judgment overview graphic: devolution to father’s heirs under Section 15(2)(a)

Issues

  • Did Kirpo have only a limited right in land allotted in India in place of her husband’s Pakistan property?
  • On Santi’s death, does the property devolve on her husband’s brother or according to Section 15(2)(a)?

Rules

Section 15(2)(a), Hindu Succession Act

If a woman inherited property from her father or mother, then—absent her children or grandchildren—it devolves upon the heirs of her father.

Section 14, Hindu Succession Act

Property a Hindu female possesses is her absolute property, before or after 1956. She is a full owner, not a limited owner.

Timeline visual: inheritance from parents and devolution rule under Section 15(2)(a)

Facts (Timeline)

Kehar Singh owned land. After his death, his widow Kirpo and daughters Santi and Indro migrated to India.

In India, Kirpo was allotted land in lieu of the Pakistan property.

On Kirpo’s death, daughters Santi and Indro inherited the land equally.

Santi died in 1960. The property was mutated in the name of her sister, Indro.

Bhagat Ram sued for specific performance based on an agreement with Indro and obtained a decree.

Teja Singh (brother of Santi’s pre-deceased husband) claimed that on Santi’s death the property devolved on him under Section 15(1)(b).

Trial Court decreed for Teja Singh; High Court dismissed the appeal; matter reached the Supreme Court.

Arguments

For Teja Singh

  • Devolution should be under Section 15(1)(b) to husband’s heirs.
  • Kirpo’s right was limited; thus, chain favors husband’s side.

For Bhagat Ram / Indro

  • Santi’s share was inherited from her mother who got it in lieu of father’s property → apply Section 15(2)(a).
  • Under Section 14, women hold property as absolute owners, but devolution rule is still Section 15(2)(a).

Judgment

The Supreme Court held that where a Hindu female inherited property from her father or mother, and has no children or grandchildren, it devolves on the heirs of her father under Section 15(2)(a). Section 14(1) makes her a full owner, yet the succession route remains governed by Section 15(2) when its condition is met. Therefore, the claim of the husband’s brother failed.

Ratio Decidendi

Source of inheritance decides the path of devolution. If the woman’s title traces to her parents, Section 15(2)(a) sends it to the father’s heirs on her death in the absence of issue, even though she held it as an absolute owner under Section 14.

Why It Matters

  • Gives a clear test: look at the source of the woman’s property.
  • Protects the natal family line where property came from parents.
  • Harmonizes absolute ownership (Section 14) with special devolution (Section 15(2)).

Key Takeaways

  1. Section 14: Hindu female = absolute owner.
  2. Section 15(2)(a): Property from parents → devolves to father’s heirs if no issue.
  3. If property not from parents → apply Section 15(1).
  4. Always track the source to pick the right clause.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: PARENT-IN → FATHER-OUTParent-sourced property goes out to father’s heirs if no issue.

  1. Find Source: From parents or elsewhere?
  2. Apply Rule: Parents → 15(2)(a); otherwise → 15(1).
  3. Confirm Ownership: She was absolute owner by Section 14.

IRAC

Issue: Who inherits a Hindu woman’s property when she got it in lieu of her father’s property and dies without issue?

Rule: Section 14 → absolute ownership; Section 15(2)(a) → devolves to father’s heirs if property came from parents.

Application: Santi’s title flowed from mother (who got land for father’s property). Thus, apply 15(2)(a).

Conclusion: Property devolves on father’s heirs, not the husband’s brother.

Glossary

Absolute Owner
Full legal owner with complete rights, not limited or life estate.
Devolution
Legal passing of property on death to rightful heirs.
Natal Family
A woman’s family of birth—her parents’ line.

FAQs

No. Section 14 sets ownership. Section 15 decides who inherits. Both operate together.

Then Section 15(2)(a) does not divert it to father’s heirs; her own issue inherit first.

Yes, if it is in lieu of parental property, the source traces to the parents, triggering 15(2)(a).

When the property is not inherited from parents; then the general scheme under Section 15(1) governs.

Page Metadata

  • PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: Section 15(2)(a) HSA; Section 14 HSA; female succession; devolution to father’s heirs
  • SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: absolute ownership; parental inheritance; Supreme Court of India; Hindu Succession Act
  • PUBLISH_DATE: 31 Oct 2025
  • AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi
  • LOCATION: India
```
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Hindu Succession Section 15(2)(a) Supreme Court

Comment

Nothing for now