• Today: October 31, 2025

The Central India Spinning & Weaving & Manufacturing Co. v. Municipal Committee, Wardha

31 October, 2025
151
Central India Spinning & Weaving Co. v. Municipal Committee, Wardha — Terminal Tax on Goods in Transit explained

The Central India Spinning & Weaving & Manufacturing Co. v. Municipal Committee, Wardha

Easy-English explainer of AIR 1985 SC 341: Terminal tax on goods merely passing through a municipality.

Supreme Court of India 1985 Bench: Notified in citation AIR 1985 SC 341 Municipal Law · Taxation ~5 min read
Illustration: trucks passing through municipal limits on a public road
Author: Gulzar Hashmi India Published: Slug: central-india-spinning-and-weaving-and-manufacturing-company-v-municipal-committee-wardha

Quick Summary

Core point: Goods that only pass through a municipality on a public road, without unloading or reloading there, cannot be charged terminal tax. They are simply in transit.

The Supreme Court held that the cotton bales moving from Yeotmal to Nagpur via a road through Wardha did not enter Wardha for import or export purposes. So, Wardha’s terminal tax demand was unlawful, and the assessee was entitled to relief.

```

Issues

  1. Can terminal tax be levied on goods that only pass through Wardha’s limits, with no unloading or reloading in Wardha?
  2. Is the Municipal Committee liable to refund the tax collected on such through-traffic goods?

Rules

  • Favour the taxpayer: If a tax law allows two reasonable meanings, choose the one that helps the citizen, not the one that adds burden.
  • Limit broad words: Wide words in a statute are read in line with the Act’s purpose; they do not stretch beyond the object of the law.
C.P. & Berar Municipalities Act, s.66(1)(o)

Facts (Timeline)

Transit on PWD road only
Company runs spinning & weaving mills at Yeotmal.
Cotton bales move by road from Yeotmal to Nagpur.
Vehicles use a PWD road that passes through Wardha municipal limits.
No unloading or reloading happens inside Wardha.
Wardha Municipality, citing s.66(1)(o), collects ₹240 terminal tax as “export”.
Company seeks refund; authorities reject; High Court upholds tax.
Supreme Court hears appeal by special leave.
Timeline graphic of goods moving Yeotmal → Wardha limits → Nagpur

Arguments

Appellant (Company)

  • Goods only passed through; they were not exported from Wardha.
  • Transit on a public road is not a taxable event under terminal tax.
  • Taxing through-traffic is beyond the Act’s object; refund due.

Respondent (Municipality)

  • Movement across limits amounts to export from the municipality.
  • Wide wording of the provision permits levy.
  • High Court agreed; collection is valid.

Judgment

Appeal Allowed

The Supreme Court ruled that no terminal tax was chargeable. The goods never truly entered Wardha for import/export purposes; they were only in transit. The Court set aside the High Court’s view and granted relief to the company.

Gavel and judgment summary for terminal tax case

Ratio

  • Meaning of “imported into” / “exported from”: These terms require more than mere entry/exit. Goods must integrate with the local mass of goods.
  • Transit goods: Articles only passing through a municipal area are not liable to terminal tax.
  • Interpretation: Between two fair readings of a tax statute, the one favouring the taxpayer prevails.

Why It Matters

This ruling protects through-traffic—transporters using public roads to cross a town—from casual municipal levies. It keeps trade routes open and costs predictable.

Key Takeaways

  • Mere passage ≠ import/export.
  • Transit goods are outside terminal tax net.
  • Broad words are cut to fit the Act’s purpose.
  • Doubt in tax law goes to the citizen.
  • Refund follows when levy lacks authority.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: Pass-Through, No-Tax, Mix-Matters” (PNM).

  1. Pass-Through: Goods only cross the town.
  2. No-Tax: Transit is not taxable.
  3. Mix-Matters: Tax only if goods mix with local stock.

IRAC Outline

Issue Whether terminal tax applies to goods merely passing through Wardha without unloading/reloading.
Rule Tax statutes read in favour of citizens when in doubt; “import/export” needs integration with local goods; transit ≠ taxable event.
Application The cotton bales never mixed with Wardha’s market. They only crossed Wardha on a PWD road. Thus, no taxable import or export happened within Wardha.
Conclusion No terminal tax is payable; the levy was invalid; appeal allowed.

Glossary

Terminal Tax
A levy on goods when they enter or leave a municipal area as part of trade.
Transit Goods
Goods only passing through an area without stopping for trade.
Integration (Mixing)
Goods becoming part of the local market stock.

FAQs

No. Entry or exit must be for trade in that area. Transit alone does not create liability.

No unloading/reloading, continuous journey, and use of a public through-road are common indicators.

The taxpayer. Courts choose the interpretation that lessens the burden on the citizen.

No. The law’s object is not to tax mere passage. Tax targets trade within the area.

Refund of the amount collected, subject to procedure and limitation rules.
Reviewed by The Law Easy India
Municipal Law Transit & Trade Taxation
```

Comment

Nothing for now