• Today: October 31, 2025

Vijaya Manohar Arbat v. Kashi Rao Rajaram Sawai

31 October, 2025
101
Vijaya Manohar Arbat v. Kashi Rao Rajaram Sawai (1987) — Section 125 CrPC | The Law Easy
```

Vijaya Manohar Arbat v. Kashi Rao Rajaram Sawai (1987)

Simple explainer in classroom-style English — Section 125 CrPC and the duty of a daughter to maintain a needy parent.

Supreme Court of India 1987 AIR 1987 SC 1100 CrPC • Maintenance 6 min read
Author: Gulzar Hashmi
Location: India
Published:
```
Supreme Court building with case title overlay
CASE_TITLE: Vijaya Manohar Arbat v. Kashi Rao Rajaram Sawai PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: Section 125 CrPC, maintenance to parents, daughter’s duty SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: Supreme Court 1987, AIR 1987 SC 1100, parental support AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi LOCATION: India PUBLISH_DATE: 2025-10-31 Slug: vijaya-manohar-arbat-v-kashi-rao-rajaram-sawai

Quick Summary

This case answers a simple question: Can a parent claim maintenance from a daughter? The Supreme Court said Yes. Section 125(1)(d) CrPC puts the duty on both sons and daughters to support a parent who cannot maintain themselves.

  • Supreme Court
  • 1987
  • AIR 1987 SC 1100

Issues

  1. Whether a father who cannot maintain himself can seek maintenance from his daughter under Section 125(1)(d) CrPC.

Rules

Section 125(1)(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure creates a legal duty on both a son and a daughter to maintain a father or mother who is unable to maintain themselves.

Purpose: to prevent destitution and enforce a basic social obligation.

Facts (Timeline)

Case facts shown as a simple timeline
The appellant, Dr. Vijaya Manohar Arbat, is a medical practitioner and the daughter of Respondent No. 1.
Respondent No. 1 applied before the Judicial Magistrate seeking ₹500 per month as maintenance from his daughter, stating he could not maintain himself.
The daughter objected: she argued a father cannot claim maintenance from a daughter under Section 125(1)(d) CrPC.
The Magistrate overruled the objection and held the application maintainable.
On revision, the Bombay High Court affirmed: a needy father may claim from a married daughter with sufficient means.
The daughter then filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court.

Arguments

Appellant (Daughter)

  • Section 125(1)(d) does not cover a daughter’s liability toward a father.
  • Marriage changes her legal obligations toward her parental family.

Respondent (Father)

  • The section is gender-neutral: it includes both sons and daughters.
  • He lacks means; the daughter has sufficient means as a doctor.

Judgment

Judgment gavel representing Supreme Court ruling

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. It held that a daughter does not stop being a daughter after marriage. Section 125(1)(d) CrPC places responsibility on both sons and daughters to maintain a needy parent.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 125(1)(d) CrPC is a social justice measure. Its words and purpose show a gender-neutral duty. A married daughter with sufficient means can be directed to pay maintenance to a parent who cannot maintain themselves.

Why It Matters

  • Confirms equal duty of sons and daughters.
  • Prevents parental destitution using a quick criminal law remedy.
  • Often asked in exams on CrPC — Section 125.

Key Takeaways

  • S.125(1)(d) → children must maintain parents: applies to sons & daughters.
  • Marriage does not end a daughter’s relationship or duty.
  • Focus is on need of parent and means of child.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “DAD”Daughter too liable • After marriage still daughter • Duty to maintain.

  1. Identify the needy parent.
  2. Check the child’s means (son or daughter).
  3. Apply Section 125(1)(d): order maintenance if needed.

IRAC Outline

Issue Can a father claim maintenance from his daughter under Section 125(1)(d) CrPC?
Rule Section 125(1)(d) imposes a duty on sons and daughters to maintain a parent who cannot maintain themselves.
Application The father lacked means; the daughter, a doctor, had sufficient means. Marriage did not end her duty.
Conclusion Maintenance application maintainable against the daughter; appeal dismissed.

Glossary

Maintenance (S.125 CrPC)
Monthly support ordered to prevent destitution of close relatives.
Maintainable
Legally fit to be heard and decided by the court.
Special Leave Petition (SLP)
A request asking the Supreme Court to grant leave to appeal.

FAQs

A parent who cannot maintain themselves can claim maintenance from a daughter too, not just a son.

No. Marriage does not end the relationship or legal duty under Section 125(1)(d) CrPC.

AIR 1987 SC 1100.

It prevents destitution by providing a fast remedy for basic support of close family members.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Section 125 CrPC Maintenance Supreme Court Family Responsibility
```

Comment

Nothing for now