• Today: October 31, 2025

Sujata Sharma v. Manu Gupta & Ors

31 October, 2025
151
Sujata Sharma v. Manu Gupta — Can the Eldest Daughter Be Karta of HUF? | The Law Easy

Sujata Sharma v. Manu Gupta & Ors

Delhi High Court CS (OS) 2011/2006 HSA §6 HUF & Karta ~6 min read India
Delhi High Court illustration with HUF Karta leadership icon
Author: Gulzar Hashmi Published: CASE_TITLE: Mrs Sujata Sharma v Shri Manu Gupta & Ors Slug: sujata-sharma-v-manu-gupta-ors

Quick Summary

Can the eldest daughter lead a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) as its Karta? The Delhi High Court said yes. After the 2005 amendment to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, a daughter is a coparcener like a son. Since Karta-ship follows seniority among coparceners, gender is not a disqualification.

Issues

  1. Is the eldest daughter of a HUF eligible to be the Karta?

Rules

  • Post-2005, a daughter is a coparcener with the same rights and duties as a son (HSA §6).
  • Karta is the senior-most coparcener; gender does not decide eligibility.
  • Customary practice cannot override a statutory provision.

Facts — Timeline

Timeline graphic for Sujata Sharma case

1963: D.R. Gupta created an HUF “D.R. Gupta and Sons,” with a leased Delhi bungalow and movables/shares.

1971: D.R. Gupta died. Eldest son Kishan Mohan Gupta became Karta.

Later: All five sons, including Kishan Mohan, passed away.

Claim: Manu Gupta, eldest surviving male from a younger branch, declared himself Karta.

Challenge: Sujata Sharma, eldest daughter of Kishan Mohan, asserted her right to be Karta as a coparcener under the 2005 amendment.

Suit: Mrs. Sharma filed a civil suit in the Delhi High Court seeking recognition as Karta.

Arguments

Appellant (Mrs. Sujata Sharma)

  • After HSA 2005, a daughter is a coparcener.
  • Seniority, not gender, decides Karta-ship.
  • Custom cannot defeat the statute.

Respondents (Manu Gupta & Ors)

  • Karta-ship traditionally with the eldest male.
  • Claimed daughter cannot be Karta despite coparcenary.
  • Sought recognition of his declaration as Karta.

Judgment

Judgment gavel with HUF leadership icon

Held: A woman can be the Karta of a HUF. The earlier disability was the absence of coparcenary. After 2005, that disability is removed.

  • Statute prevails over contrary custom.
  • The senior-most coparcener—male or female—can be Karta.
  • Gender-based disqualification is impermissible.

Ratio Decidendi

Once daughters are coparceners under HSA §6 (2005), eligibility for Karta flows from coparcenary + seniority, not gender. Custom cannot override the statute.

Why It Matters (Exam & Practice)

  • Equality Milestone: Confirms leadership roles for daughters in HUFs.
  • Advisory Impact: Deeds, bank ops, tax filings may name a female Karta.
  • Litigation Clarity: Seniority determines Karta, not male lineage.

Key Takeaways

  • Daughters are coparceners (HSA §6).
  • Karta = senior-most coparcener.
  • Custom cannot beat statute.
  • Gender-neutral leadership in HUFs.
  • Update HUF records to reflect female Karta when applicable.
  • Use this case with Vineeta Sharma for exam answers.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “Coparcener → Senior → Karta”

  • Coparcener: Daughter = Son after 2005.
  • Senior: Eldest coparcener leads.
  • Karta: Gender is irrelevant.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Can the eldest daughter of a HUF be the Karta?

Rule

HSA 2005 makes daughters coparceners; Karta is the senior-most coparcener; custom cannot override statute.

Application

Eldest daughter, being a coparcener and senior-most, meets Karta requirements despite gender-based objections.

Conclusion

Yes, she can be Karta. Gender is not a disqualification.

Glossary

HUF
Hindu Undivided Family: a family unit recognized in tax and personal law.
Karta
Head/manager of a HUF; leads and represents the family in legal and financial matters.
Coparcener
A member with birth-based interest in HUF property; after 2005, includes daughters.

FAQs

The senior-most coparcener, regardless of gender. After HSA 2005, daughters are coparceners too.

No. The court held that statute prevails. Gender-based bar is not valid after 2005.

HSA §6 (2005) gives daughters equal coparcenary status, removing the old bar.

It confirmed that a woman can be Karta if she is the senior-most coparcener. Custom cannot override statute.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Category:
Hindu Law HUF Gender Equality
```
Optional timeline image for Sujata Sharma case Optional judgment image for Sujata Sharma case

Comment

Nothing for now