• Today: October 31, 2025

Sathyaprema Manjunatha Gowda v. Controller of Estate Duty Karnataka (1997) 10 SCC 684

31 October, 2025
151
Sathyaprema Manjunatha Gowda v. Controller of Estate Duty Karnataka (1997) 10 SCC 684 | Estate Duty: Partition vs Survivorship

Sathyaprema Manjunatha Gowda v. Controller of Estate Duty Karnataka (1997) 10 SCC 684

Does a share taken on partition stay joint for tax, or become individual? Supreme Court answers for estate duty.

Supreme Court of India 1997 (1997) 10 SCC 684 HUF & Estate Duty ~7 min read
partition vs survivorship estate duty Mysore Act s.8(1)(d)
Illustration: estate duty applied to partitioned individual property
```
Author: Gulzar Hashmi  |  Location: India  |  Published: 31 Oct 2025
```
```

Quick Summary

CASE_TITLE Sathyaprema Manjunatha Gowda v. Controller of Estate Duty Karnataka, (1997) 10 SCC 684

The Supreme Court held that Manjunatha Gowda’s property was taken on partition, not by survivorship. After partition, the share became his individual property. Therefore, the estate duty applied to the entire estate. The widow’s and unmarried daughter’s shares could not be excluded under Section 8(1)(d) of the Mysore Act, which works only when property passes by survivorship.

Judgment overview: partition leads to individual property and full estate duty

Issues

  • Should the widow and unmarried daughter shares be excluded from estate duty?
  • Was the property held by survivorship or received by partition?

Rules

Mysore Act VIII of 1933 — Section 8(1)(d)

Exemption for certain shares applies when property devolves by survivorship within a coparcenary. If not by survivorship, the exemption does not apply.

Partition vs. Survivorship

Partition severs joint status; the share becomes separate/individual. Survivorship works only while a coparcenary continues, with shares shifting on births and deaths.

Timeline visual: from HUF to individual property on partition

Facts (Timeline)

HUF: Manjunatha Gowda was in a HUF with his father Mallegowda and others.

4 May 1965: He obtained a 4/5 share in HUF property by partition.

18 Aug 1971: He died. Widow Sathyaprema claimed exclusion for her and her unmarried daughter’s shares under Section 8(1)(d).

Initial exclusion was granted by the Estate Duty Officer, but later reversed on appeal. Entire estate was brought to duty.

The Karnataka High Court upheld the reversal. Widow appealed to the Supreme Court.

Arguments

Appellant (Widow)

  • Sought exclusion of her and unmarried daughter’s shares under s.8(1)(d).
  • Framed character of holding as akin to survivorship.

Respondent (CED)

  • Property was separate due to partition, not survivorship.
  • Entire estate must be subjected to duty.

Judgment

The Supreme Court held that the property was received by partition. Section 8(1)(d) applies only when property devolves by survivorship, which was not the case. With no surviving coparcenary at death, the share remained individual property; thus, estate duty applied to the whole estate. Appeal dismissed, no costs.

Ratio Decidendi

Once a share is taken on partition, it is no longer joint family property. It is the holder’s individual estate. Exemptions tied to survivorship do not apply.

Why It Matters

  • Gives a clear tax test: ask if title came by partition or survivorship.
  • Protects the revenue base where joint status is severed.
  • Clarifies scope of Mysore Act s.8(1)(d) in HUF contexts.

Key Takeaways

  1. Partition = separate estate → full estate duty.
  2. Survivorship exemption needs a continuing coparcenary.
  3. Check the mode of acquisition to apply the right section.
  4. Widow/daughter exclusion fails if property is individual.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “PART = PERSONAL”Partition makes it personal (individual estate).

  1. Trace Title: Partition or survivorship?
  2. Pick Rule: Partition → no survivorship exemption.
  3. Tax Result: Entire estate liable to duty.

IRAC

Issue: Are widow and unmarried daughter’s shares excludable; was property held by survivorship or partition?

Rule: Mysore Act s.8(1)(d) applies only to survivorship. Partition severs joint status; share becomes individual.

Application: Decedent took 4/5 share by partition. No coparcenary at death; no survivorship.

Conclusion: Entire estate taxable; exclusions denied.

Glossary

Coparcenary
A narrower unit within a HUF; only male line within three degrees from the holder (as historically stated in the case law context).
Survivorship
Right where the interest of a deceased coparcener passes to surviving coparceners as the body continues.
Partition
Separation of shares; property becomes the holder’s individual estate.

FAQs

Because the property did not pass by survivorship. It was separate due to prior partition.

Then survivorship principles could apply, and the exemption might be examined under s.8(1)(d).

Partition makes the share individual property. Estate duty then assesses the full individual estate, subject to other applicable provisions.

Track the mode of acquisition. If by partition, treat as separate estate; if by survivorship, apply survivorship rules.

Page Metadata

  • PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: estate duty; partition vs survivorship; HUF property; Mysore Act s.8(1)(d)
  • SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: coparcenary; separate estate; Supreme Court of India; taxation of HUF shares
  • PUBLISH_DATE: 31 Oct 2025
  • AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi
  • LOCATION: India
```
Reviewed by The Law Easy
HUF & Taxation Mysore Act s.8(1)(d) Supreme Court

Comment

Nothing for now