• Today: October 31, 2025

amardeep-singh-v-harveen-kaur-2017-sc

31 October, 2025
151
Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) — Waiver of 6-Month Cooling-Off under Section 13B(2) HMA | The Law Easy

Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur

Section 13B(2) HMA — Waiver of six-month cooling-off in mutual consent divorce.

Supreme Court of India 2017 Family Law CA 11158/2017 Author: Gulzar Hashmi Reading time: 6–8 min
Hero illustration for Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur case explainer
```
Location: India    Primary: Section 13B(2) HMA; cooling-off waiver; mutual consent divorce; reconciliation efforts; settlement    Secondary: Supreme Court 2017; directory not mandatory; custody; alimony; separation period
```

Quick Summary

Case Title: Amardeep Singh v. Harveen KaurCA No. 11158 of 2017 (SC)

Parties married in 1994. After long disputes and separation, they reached a full settlement and sought mutual consent divorce. They asked the Supreme Court to waive the six-month waiting period under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Court held the period is directory, not mandatory, and may be waived when reunion is hopeless and settlement covers all issues.

Section 13B(2) Mutual Consent Cooling-Off Waiver No Reconciliation

Issues

  1. Is the six-month period in Section 13B(2) mandatory or directory?
  2. Can courts waive the period in exceptional situations to serve justice?

Rules

Object of Section 13B: Let parties dissolve a broken marriage by consent and enable rehabilitation.

Waiver Principle: If there are no chances of reunion and all issues are settled, courts are not powerless to enable a better option by waiving the period.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline visual
Timeline of key facts in Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur
1994: Marriage; two children born during the marriage.
Years of disputes lead to civil and criminal cases between spouses.
2017: Parties reach a full settlement; decide on mutual consent divorce.
Alimony fixed at ₹2.75 crores; two cheques of ₹50 lakhs each given as part payment.
Custody of both children to the husband; other terms settled.
Parties seek waiver of the six-month period under Section 13B(2) due to eight years of separation and no chance of reunion.

Arguments

Appellant’s Side

  • Cooling-off is a procedural step, not an absolute bar.
  • Long separation, failed reconciliation, and complete settlement justify waiver.

Respondent’s Side

  • Supports the mutual consent divorce and the waiver to avoid further hardship.
  • Emphasizes rehabilitation and closure for both parties.

Judgment

Outcome: Cooling-Off Waived (Discretion)
Judgment visual for Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur
  • The Supreme Court held Section 13B(2) is directory, not mandatory.
  • Courts may waive the six-month period where: (i) parties lived separately beyond the statutory period; (ii) all issues like alimony, custody, and property are settled; (iii) reconciliation attempts have failed; and (iv) waiting would only prolong misery.
  • Waiver depends on the facts of each case and lies in the court’s discretion.

Ratio Decidendi

Purpose over procedure. Section 13B exists to end dead marriages and aid rehabilitation. When reunion is clearly impossible and settlement is complete, strict waiting serves no purpose. Hence the period is waivable.

Why It Matters

  • Balances human realities with legal procedure.
  • Guides family courts on when to waive cooling-off to avoid needless delay.
  • Key authority for mutual consent divorce practice across India.

Key Takeaways

  1. Section 13B(2) is directory; courts can waive it.
  2. Need long separation, failed reconciliation, and full settlement.
  3. Waiver is a discretionary relief based on case facts.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: W-A-I-V-EWaiver possible, All issues settled, Impossible reunion, Verified separation, Equitable discretion.

3-Step Hook:

  1. Check separation & settlement.
  2. Test reconciliation chances.
  3. If none: seek waiver of 13B(2).

IRAC Outline

Issue Whether the six-month cooling-off in Section 13B(2) is mandatory or can be waived in exceptional cases.
Rule Object is consent-based dissolution and rehabilitation; courts not powerless to enable a better option where reunion is impossible.
Application Parties separated long; all disputes settled; attempts at reconciliation failed; further wait would cause hardship.
Conclusion Provision is directory; waiver allowed at court’s discretion on the facts.

Glossary

Mutual Consent Divorce
Both spouses agree to dissolve the marriage under Section 13B HMA.
Cooling-Off Period
Six months between first and second motion to allow reconsideration.
Directory Provision
Guideline that can be relaxed; not a rigid mandate.

FAQs

No. If facts justify, courts can waive the period under Section 13B(2).

Long separation, failed reconciliation, and a comprehensive settlement covering money, custody, and other issues.

Both spouses—waiver avoids unnecessary delay when the marriage is clearly over.

No. It is discretionary—the court examines the facts and the interests of justice.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Family Law Section 13B(2) Mutual Consent
```
© 2025 The Law Easy — All rights reserved.
CASE_TITLE: Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur  |  AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi  |  LOCATION: India
PUBLISH_DATE: 2025-10-31
PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: Section 13B(2) HMA; cooling-off waiver; mutual consent divorce; reconciliation; settlement; directory provision
SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: Supreme Court 2017; CA 11158/2017; custody; alimony; separation period; rehabilitation
Slug: amardeep-singh-v-harveen-kaur-2017-sc

Comment

Nothing for now