• Today: October 31, 2025

Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash

31 October, 2025
151
Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash (AIR 1992 SC 1904) – Mutual Consent Divorce under Section 13B | The Law Easy
CASE_TITLE Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash Supreme Court of India 1992 Citation: AIR 1992 SC 1904 Hindu Marriage Act / Family Law Reading: ~5 min
AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi
LOCATION: India
PUBLISH_DATE: 31 Oct 2025
```

Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash (1992)

Section 13B, Hindu Marriage Act — mutual consent must continue till decree. Either spouse may withdraw before the court grants divorce.

PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: Section 13B HMA; mutual consent; withdrawal of consent SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: cooling-off period; decree stage; unilateral withdrawal; family law Slug: sureshta-devi-v-om-prakash
Hero image for Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash case explainer
```
```

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court clarified Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act. A mutual consent petition does not automatically lead to a divorce decree. Consent must continue at the decree stage. Any spouse may withdraw consent before the decree. If consent is withdrawn, the court cannot grant divorce under Section 13B.

  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Year: 1992
  • Citation: AIR 1992 SC 1904

Issues

  1. Can a spouse withdraw consent to a mutual consent divorce under Section 13B before the decree?

Rules

  • Section 13B(2) HMA: Provides a 6–18 month waiting (cooling-off) period; court cannot grant decree without it.
  • The provision does not say that a change of mind must be by both parties; one spouse can change their mind.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline image for Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash
1968: Marriage of Sureshta Devi and Om Prakash. They cohabited for about six to seven months, then lived separately.
09 Jan 1985: Both filed a joint petition under Section 13B (mutual consent divorce).
15 Jan 1985: Wife applied to withdraw; alleged pressure and no access to relatives before her earlier statement.
District Judge dismissed the divorce petition.
High Court reversed: held that unilateral withdrawal is not allowed; found no force, fraud, or undue influence.
Supreme Court examined whether consent may be withdrawn before the decree.

Arguments

Appellant’s Side

  • Consent given once should bind both parties through the decree stage.
  • Allegations of pressure were unfounded; process should continue.

Respondent’s Side

  • Consent is revocable before decree; Section 13B requires live consent at the second motion.
  • Raised concerns about voluntariness of the earlier statement.

Judgment (Held)

Judgment themed image for the case

The Supreme Court allowed withdrawal before decree. It held that consent is a continuous requirement under Section 13B. The “crucial time” is when parties move the court for the decree, not just at filing. Therefore, a spouse may withdraw consent any time before the decree is passed.

Ratio Decidendi

  • Mutual consent must subsist at both stages; absence of consent at decree stage defeats Section 13B.
  • Either spouse can unilaterally withdraw consent before the decree.
  • Cooling-off period ensures real consent and space for reconsideration.

Why It Matters

The ruling protects autonomy and prevents forced divorces. It ensures that a decree by mutual consent happens only when both spouses still agree at the final stage.

Key Takeaways

  • Consent must be alive at the decree stage.
  • Unilateral withdrawal is valid before decree.
  • Filing alone does not guarantee divorce.
  • Cooling-off period is mandatory under Section 13B(2).

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: LIVE CONSENTLive at decree, Individual withdrawal allowed, Verified after cooling-off, Essential for Section 13B.

  1. Check if both still consent at second motion.
  2. Apply Section 13B(2): observe cooling-off period.
  3. Conclude: if one withdraws, decree cannot be passed.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Can a spouse withdraw consent for a mutual consent divorce before the decree?

Rule

Section 13B(2) requires a waiting period and continuing consent at decree stage.

Application

Wife withdrew consent after filing; at decree stage consent was not mutual. Therefore, Section 13B relief could not be granted.

Conclusion

Withdrawal before decree is valid; mutual consent divorce fails if consent is not continuing.

Glossary

Section 13B HMA
Provision for divorce by mutual consent with a waiting period.
Cooling-off Period
6–18 months to reconsider and confirm free consent.
Second Motion
Later stage when parties move for the decree; consent must still exist.
Withdrawal of Consent
Right of any spouse to revoke consent before decree is passed.

FAQs

Yes. If one spouse withdraws before the decree, mutual consent fails and divorce cannot be granted.

No. The crucial time is when the court considers the decree; consent must still be present then.

To ensure consent is free, informed, and continuing. It allows time to reconsider or reconcile.

If withdrawn before the decree, the court cannot pass a mutual consent divorce order under Section 13B.
```
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Section 13B HMA Mutual Consent Withdrawal of Consent
Top

Comment

Nothing for now