• Today: October 31, 2025

Mussa Miya walad Mahammed Shaffi v. Kadar Bax

31 October, 2025
201
Mussa Miya walad Mahammed Shaffi v. Kadar Bax (1928) — Muslim Law: Gift vs Will | The Law Easy

Mussa Miya walad Mahammed Shaffi v. Kadar Bax (1928)

Easy explainer on Muslim Law — Hiba (gift) vs Will: can a grandfather’s gift to minor grandsons stand when he keeps possession himself?

Privy Council 1928 AIR 1928 PC 108 Muslim Law • Hiba • Will 6 min read
Author: Gulzar Hashmi
Location: India
Published:
Court building with Muslim law gift vs will theme
CASE_TITLE: Mussa Miya walad Mahammed Shaffi v. Kadar Bax PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: Muslim law, hiba, delivery of possession, gift to minors SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: will, guardian exception, AIR 1928 PC 108 AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi LOCATION: India PUBLISH_DATE: 2025-10-31 Slug: mussa-miya-walad-mahammed-shaffi-v-kadar-bax

Quick Summary

A grandfather said he gifted all his property to his minor grandsons. He kept control and possession till death. The Privy Council held the gift (hiba) was not complete because there was no delivery of possession. The letters showed only a testamentary intention and worked as a will, not as a present gift.

  • Privy Council
  • 1928
  • AIR 1928 PC 108

Issues

  1. Is a gift made by a maternal grandfather to his minor grandsons, represented by their father, valid when the donor keeps possession?

Rules

Under Muslim law, a hiba requires: (1) clear declaration, (2) acceptance, and (3) delivery of possession. If the donor retains control, the gift is incomplete, unless a narrow guardian exception applies (not extended to every grandparent).

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline of events: family living together, letters, claim over property
Rahimatbi (daughter) and her husband lived with her father, Abdul Rasul.
Dispute arose over ownership of Abdul Rasul’s property after his death; widow, daughter, and brother claimed shares under Muslim law.
Widow and daughter stated: Abdul Rasul made an oral gift to the grandsons and wrote letters stating they should own the property after his death.
They also said the grandsons were raised by Abdul Rasul and lived with him.
Respondent denied the gift and asserted legal shares by heirs; suit followed.

Arguments

Appellants (Grandsons)

  • Relied on oral gift and letters showing donor’s intention.
  • Claimed they lived with and were maintained by the donor; father represented them as minors.

Respondent

  • Argued there was no delivery of possession; donor kept control.
  • Sought distribution by heirship shares under Muslim law.

Judgment

Gavel with letters symbolising testamentary intent

The Privy Council held there was no valid gift because the donor did not deliver possession or give up control. The letters showed an intent that the grandsons should have the property after his death, so they operated as a will, not a present hiba. The guardian exception did not apply because the donor was not the legal guardian in the required sense.

Ratio Decidendi

For a hiba to be complete, delivery of possession is essential. Mere statements or letters are not enough if the donor keeps possession. A grandparent is not automatically a guardian whose gift is complete without delivery.

Why It Matters

  • Clarifies the gift vs will line under Muslim law.
  • Highlights the mandatory role of possession in completing a hiba.
  • Guides drafting and family planning for minor beneficiaries.

Key Takeaways

  • Hiba needs possession — control must pass.
  • Letters showing “after death” → act as will, not present gift.
  • Grandparent ≠ automatic guardian exception.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “G-I-F-T”Give + Intend + Formal Transfer (possession).

  1. Check words: gift now or after death?
  2. Check possession: did control move?
  3. Classify: if no possession → it’s a will.

IRAC Outline

Issue Whether a grandfather’s gift to minor grandsons is valid when the donor keeps possession.
Rule Hiba requires declaration, acceptance, and delivery of possession. Without delivery, gift is incomplete; limited guardian exception.
Application Donor retained control; letters pointed to transfer after death; he was not a guardian within the exception.
Conclusion No valid gift; letters operate as a will only.

Glossary

Hiba
A present, unconditional gift under Muslim law requiring delivery of possession.
Delivery of Possession
Handing over control so the donee becomes the real holder of the property.
Guardian Exception
Limited rule allowing gift completion without physical delivery when a legal guardian transfers to a minor in some cases.

FAQs

There was no valid gift because possession was not delivered. The letters were treated as a will, not as a completed hiba.

No. Co-residence alone is not enough. Control must pass to the donee or a proper guardian for a valid hiba.

Not automatically. The donor must be a legal guardian in the required sense. Here, that condition was not met.

Ensure clear declaration, acceptance, and deliver possession (or hand to a proper guardian). Otherwise, use a will.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Muslim Law Hiba Will Privy Council
```

Comment

Nothing for now