Balraj Taneja v. Sunil Madan (AIR 1999 SC 3381)
By Gulzar Hashmi • India • Published: 22 Oct 2025
Quick Summary
The Delhi High Court decreed specific performance only because the defendants did not file a written statement. The Supreme Court said this is not enough.
- Order 8 Rule 10 CPC gives power, but courts must use it with care.
- A valid judgment needs reasons, issues, and findings. A one-line decree is not a judgment.
- In specific performance, the plaintiff must show readiness and willingness (Section 16(c), Specific Relief Act).
Issues
- Can a court decree specific performance only because no written statement was filed (Order 8 Rule 10 CPC)?
- Must a judgment under Order 8 Rule 10 meet the definition of “judgment” in Section 2(9) CPC and Order 20 Rule 4(2) CPC?
Rules
- Order 8 Rule 10 CPC: Court may pronounce judgment if WS is not filed, but must see if the plaint still needs proof.
- Section 2(9) CPC + Order 20 Rule 4(2): A judgment must state the case, points for decision, findings, and reasons.
- Specific Relief Act, Section 16(c): Plaintiff must plead and prove readiness and willingness.
Facts — Timeline
View ImageArguments — Appellant vs Respondent
Appellants (Sellers)
- Default decree was mechanical; plaint itself shows disputes on I-T permission.
- Specific performance needs proof of readiness and willingness.
- Judgment lacked reasons and points for decision.
Respondent (Buyer)
- No written statement despite time; plaint facts stand admitted.
- Court rightly exercised power under Order 8 Rule 10.
- Buyer ready and willing; balance was deposited.
Judgment
View Judgment Image- Order 8 Rule 10 CPC: Power exists, but use it judicially. If facts are disputed, ask for proof.
- Valid judgment: Must meet Section 2(9) and Order 20 Rule 4(2). Reasons are essential.
- Specific performance: Check Section 16(c) readiness/willingness. High Court did not do this.
Ratio Decidendi
No automatic decrees. Absence of a written statement does not excuse the court from testing the plaint, identifying issues, and giving reasons. Specific performance needs strict proof of readiness and willingness.
Why It Matters
- Clarifies limits of Order 8 Rule 10 CPC.
- Reinforces the anatomy of a valid judgment.
- Sets the bar for specific performance pleadings and proof.
Key Takeaways
- 1 “No WS” ≠ automatic decree; apply mind.
- 2 Judgment must record issues, findings, reasons.
- 3 Specific performance demands Section 16(c) proof.
- 4 If plaint shows disputes, take evidence.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook
Mnemonic: “NO WS? STILL TEST.”
- NO WS → No written statement.
- STILL → Still identify issues and reasons.
- TEST → Test readiness & willingness; ask for proof.
3-Step Hook:
- Scan the plaint: Any disputed facts?
- Frame points: Note issues and apply law.
- Record reasons: Speak to Section 16(c) before relief.
IRAC Outline
Issue
Can specific performance be decreed only due to non-filing of WS? What must a judgment contain?
Rule
Order 8 Rule 10 CPC is discretionary; Section 2(9) and Order 20 Rule 4(2) require a reasoned judgment.
Application
Plaint showed a live dispute on I-T permission, affecting readiness and willingness. Evidence was needed.
Conclusion
Default decree was improper. Orders set aside; case remanded with a chance to file WS.
Glossary
- Order 8 Rule 10 CPC
- Lets court pronounce judgment if WS is not filed, with judicial caution.
- Section 2(9) CPC
- Defines “judgment”; reasons are a must.
- Order 20 Rule 4(2)
- Judgment should state points for decision and findings.
- Section 16(c) SRA
- Plaintiff must be ready and willing to perform the contract.
Student FAQs
Related Cases
Default Judgments
- Principles on decrees without written statements.
- Limits of court discretion under procedural defaults.
Specific Performance Essentials
- Readiness & willingness standards.
- When courts refuse equitable relief.
Share
Related Post
Tags
Archive
Popular & Recent Post
Comment
Nothing for now