M/s SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd v. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd & Ors. (2019)
By Gulzar Hashmi • India • Published: 22 Oct 2025
Quick Summary
In SCG Contracts v. Chamankar, the Supreme Court made it crystal clear: in commercial suits, a defendant’s written statement cannot be taken on record after 120 days from service of summons. The bar is hard and absolute.
- Bottom line: Day 121 = too late, no discretion.
- Effect: Any written statement filed beyond 120 days must be removed from the record.
Issues
- Can a court accept a written statement filed after 120 days in a commercial suit?
Rules
- Commercial suits timeline: Written statement must be filed within 30 days; extendable for reasons up to an outer limit of 120 days from service of summons.
- Post-120 days: Court shall not take the written statement on record. No further extension is permitted.
Facts — Timeline
View ImageArguments — Appellant vs Respondent
Appellant (SCG Contracts)
- Commercial suit timeline is strict; WS beyond 120 days is impermissible.
- Earlier order cannot override the statutory bar.
Respondent
- Sought additional time; relied on court’s earlier indulgence.
- Urged that WS already on record be retained.
Judgment
View Judgment Image- Appeal allowed: Orders dated 5 Dec 2017 & 24 Sep 2018 set aside.
- WS struck off: Written statement filed beyond 120 days was removed from the record.
- Rule reaffirmed: Courts cannot extend the outer limit in commercial suits.
Ratio Decidendi
In commercial suits, after 120 days from service of summons, courts have no power to accept the defendant’s written statement.
Why It Matters
- Speeds up commercial litigation—no delays through late pleadings.
- Gives lawyers a clear, non-negotiable timeline.
- Encourages early case management and readiness.
Key Takeaways
- 1 120 days = hard stop in commercial suits.
- 2 Prior extensions cannot defeat the statute.
- 3 Late WS must be removed from the record.
- 4 Plan pleadings early; avoid last-minute filings.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook
Mnemonic: “HARD 120”
- Halt at 120 — no more time.
- Absolute bar after service-based count.
- Remove late WS from record.
- Don’t rely on indulgence orders.
3-Step Hook:
- Note service date of summons.
- Track up to 120 days with reasons if extended.
- On day 121, bar applies; WS can’t be taken on record.
IRAC Outline
Issue
Can a commercial court accept a written statement filed after 120 days?
Rule
Hard outer limit of 120 days from summons; beyond this, WS cannot be taken on record.
Application
Respondent filed WS after the cap; prior indulgence couldn’t override the statutory scheme.
Conclusion
WS struck off; Supreme Court enforced the strict limit.
Glossary
- Commercial Suit
- A suit governed by the Commercial Courts regime with strict timelines.
- Written Statement (WS)
- Defendant’s formal response to the plaint.
- Outer Limit
- Final, non-extendable deadline—here, 120 days from service.
- Order VIII Rule 1 CPC
- Provision on filing WS; in commercial suits, operates with a hard cap.
Student FAQs
Related Cases
Strict Timelines in Commercial Litigation
- Hard deadlines ensure speedy dispute resolution.
- Plan pleadings and evidence early.
Pleadings Discipline
- Delay can lead to striking off filings.
- Timely WS preserves defence rights.
Share
Related Post
Tags
Archive
Popular & Recent Post
Comment
Nothing for now