• Today: November 01, 2025

shankar-balwant-lokhande-v-chandrakant-shankar-lokhande-1995-air-1211-1995-scc-3-413

01 November, 2025
1251
Shankar Balwant Lokhande v. Chandrakant (1995) — Limitation for Final Decree on Stamps | The Law Easy
Supreme Court of India 1995 AIR 1211; (1995) 3 SCC 413 Civil Procedure • Limitation ~6 min read

Shankar Balwant Lokhande v. Chandrakant Shankar Lokhande — Limitation for Final Decree on Stamped Papers

Author: Gulzar Hashmi India CASE_TITLE: Shankar Balwant Lokhande v. Chandrakant Shankar Lokhande PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: limitation, final decree, stamped paper SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: CPC s.2(2), O.20 R.7, execution PUBLISH_DATE: 22 Oct 2025 Slug: shankar-balwant-lokhande-v-chandrakant-shankar-lokhande-1995-air-1211-1995-scc-3-413

Hero image for Lokhande v. Lokhande case explainer
Quick Summary

Simple rule for students: Limitation does not start when the court asks for non-judicial stamp papers. It starts only after a proper final decree is drawn, signed, and engrossed on stamps, clearly fixing the shares.

O.20 R.7 S.2(2) CPC AIR 1211; (1995) 3 SCC 413
Issues
  1. When does limitation begin for filing an application to pass the final decree on stamped papers?
Rules

Order 20 Rule 7 (CPC): The decree bears the date of the judgment. After the judge checks it matches the judgment, he signs it.

Section 2(2) (CPC): A decree is the formal expression of a final decision on parties’ rights. It can be preliminary, final, or partly both.

Facts — Timeline

Preliminary decree: Chandrakant was given 1/6th share; the appellants together had 5/6th. Court ordered preparation of a final decree.

Engrossment step: A final decree was drawn and signed for Chandrakant on stamped paper. For the appellants, no stamps were supplied, so no final decree existed for them.

High Court view: Since no decree was passed on stamps for the appellants, there was no executable decree for them.

Application: The appellants later moved the trial court to accept stamps and pass the final decree. Respondent objected on limitation.

Trial vs HC: Trial court rejected the limitation plea. High Court said limitation ran from the direction date to pass the final decree.

Timeline illustration for Lokhande case
Arguments
Appellants
  • Limitation cannot run before a valid final decree on stamps exists.
  • Direction to supply stamps is only a procedural step, not a decree.
Respondent
  • Limitation began from the date the court directed passing of the final decree.
  • The later application was time-barred.
Judgment

Held: Limitation does not start from the date of the court’s direction to pass the final decree. Mere direction to supply stamped papers is not a final decree.

Until a final decree is drawn up, signed, and engrossed on stamps, there is no executable decree. The Supreme Court therefore upheld the trial court and rejected the contrary High Court view.

Judgment illustration for Lokhande case
Ratio Decidendi
  • Limitation begins only after a valid final decree exists on stamped paper.
  • Directions about stamps are procedural, not a decree under Section 2(2) CPC.
Why It Matters

This ruling draws a clear line between steps toward a decree and the decree itself. For execution and limitation, only a proper final decree counts.

Key Takeaways
  • No executable decree exists until it is drawn, signed, and stamped.
  • Limitation does not run from a direction to pass a decree.
  • Section 2(2) CPC + Order 20 Rule 7 guide the form and timing of a decree.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “DRAW — SIGN — STAMP — THEN TIME.”

  1. Draw: Draft the final decree.
  2. Sign: Judge signs after checking.
  3. Stamp: Engross on non-judicial stamps.
  4. Time: Only now can limitation run.
IRAC Outline
Issue Start point of limitation to seek a final decree on stamped papers.
Rule O.20 R.7 (date, signing) and S.2(2) CPC (what is a decree).
Application Direction to supply stamps ≠ final decree. Without a stamped, signed final decree fixing shares, limitation cannot start.
Conclusion Limitation starts only after the final decree is drawn, signed, and engrossed on stamps.
Glossary
Final Decree
The decree that completes the suit by fixing rights (e.g., shares by metes and bounds).
Engrossment
Writing the final decree on proper stamp papers as required by law.
Limitation
The legally fixed time within which a party must act.
FAQs

No. It starts only after a valid final decree is drawn, signed, and stamped.

No. It is only a step toward the decree; it has no executable effect.

Law requires engrossment on non-judicial stamps for validity and execution in many property matters.

Once the decree is properly engrossed and signed, limitation is counted from that point—not from the earlier direction date.
Reviewed by The Law Easy CPC Limitation Final Decree

Comment

Nothing for now