Shankar Balwant Lokhande v. Chandrakant Shankar Lokhande — Limitation for Final Decree on Stamped Papers
Author: Gulzar Hashmi India CASE_TITLE: Shankar Balwant Lokhande v. Chandrakant Shankar Lokhande PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: limitation, final decree, stamped paper SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: CPC s.2(2), O.20 R.7, execution PUBLISH_DATE: 22 Oct 2025 Slug: shankar-balwant-lokhande-v-chandrakant-shankar-lokhande-1995-air-1211-1995-scc-3-413
Simple rule for students: Limitation does not start when the court asks for non-judicial stamp papers. It starts only after a proper final decree is drawn, signed, and engrossed on stamps, clearly fixing the shares.
O.20 R.7 S.2(2) CPC AIR 1211; (1995) 3 SCC 413- When does limitation begin for filing an application to pass the final decree on stamped papers?
Order 20 Rule 7 (CPC): The decree bears the date of the judgment. After the judge checks it matches the judgment, he signs it.
Section 2(2) (CPC): A decree is the formal expression of a final decision on parties’ rights. It can be preliminary, final, or partly both.
Preliminary decree: Chandrakant was given 1/6th share; the appellants together had 5/6th. Court ordered preparation of a final decree.
Engrossment step: A final decree was drawn and signed for Chandrakant on stamped paper. For the appellants, no stamps were supplied, so no final decree existed for them.
High Court view: Since no decree was passed on stamps for the appellants, there was no executable decree for them.
Application: The appellants later moved the trial court to accept stamps and pass the final decree. Respondent objected on limitation.
Trial vs HC: Trial court rejected the limitation plea. High Court said limitation ran from the direction date to pass the final decree.
Appellants
- Limitation cannot run before a valid final decree on stamps exists.
- Direction to supply stamps is only a procedural step, not a decree.
Respondent
- Limitation began from the date the court directed passing of the final decree.
- The later application was time-barred.
Held: Limitation does not start from the date of the court’s direction to pass the final decree. Mere direction to supply stamped papers is not a final decree.
Until a final decree is drawn up, signed, and engrossed on stamps, there is no executable decree. The Supreme Court therefore upheld the trial court and rejected the contrary High Court view.
- Limitation begins only after a valid final decree exists on stamped paper.
- Directions about stamps are procedural, not a decree under Section 2(2) CPC.
This ruling draws a clear line between steps toward a decree and the decree itself. For execution and limitation, only a proper final decree counts.
- No executable decree exists until it is drawn, signed, and stamped.
- Limitation does not run from a direction to pass a decree.
- Section 2(2) CPC + Order 20 Rule 7 guide the form and timing of a decree.
Mnemonic: “DRAW — SIGN — STAMP — THEN TIME.”
- Draw: Draft the final decree.
- Sign: Judge signs after checking.
- Stamp: Engross on non-judicial stamps.
- Time: Only now can limitation run.
| Issue | Start point of limitation to seek a final decree on stamped papers. |
|---|---|
| Rule | O.20 R.7 (date, signing) and S.2(2) CPC (what is a decree). |
| Application | Direction to supply stamps ≠ final decree. Without a stamped, signed final decree fixing shares, limitation cannot start. |
| Conclusion | Limitation starts only after the final decree is drawn, signed, and engrossed on stamps. |
- Final Decree
- The decree that completes the suit by fixing rights (e.g., shares by metes and bounds).
- Engrossment
- Writing the final decree on proper stamp papers as required by law.
- Limitation
- The legally fixed time within which a party must act.
Share
Related Post
Tags
Archive
Popular & Recent Post
Comment
Nothing for now