Rani Kusum v. Kanchan Devi (AIR 2005 SC 2304)
Supreme Court of India
2005
AIR 2005 SC 2304
CPC • Written Statement
6 min read
By Gulzar Hashmi • India • Published: 22 Oct 2025
Order 8 Rule 1 CPC
Directory vs Mandatory
Order 8 Rule 10
Procedural Justice
Quick Summary
The question was simple: Is the 30–90 days limit in Order 8 Rule 1 CPC hard and fatal, or can courts allow a late written statement?
- Answer: The limit is directory, not mandatory.
- Why: Procedure should help justice, not block it. No penal consequence is stated for delay.
- But: Extensions are not routine—only for exceptional reasons.
Issues
- Is the O8R1 time limit for a written statement mandatory or directory?
Rules
- Procedural law’s aim: to advance justice; avoid rigid readings unless statute says so.
- No penalty in O8R1: absence of a strict consequence → provision is directory.
- Court’s discretion: Late WS may be accepted in exceptional circumstances, with reasons.
- Order 8 Rule 10: Provides flexible responses to non-filing, supporting a directory view.
Exam Tip: Ask: “Is there a penal bar?” If not, lean directory—subject to restraint.
Facts — Timeline
View Image10 Nov 2003: Summons served on respondent; WS due in 30 days (extendable to 90).
10 Feb 2004: 90-day limit ends; no written statement filed.
10 Jul 2004: Written statement filed very late; plaintiff objects.
Trial Court: Accepts WS; says procedure should not defeat justice.
High Court (Patna): Affirms; O8R1 is directory.
Supreme Court (2005): Dismisses appeal; holds O8R1 is directory; discretion is narrow and reason-based.
Arguments — Appellant vs Respondent
Appellant (Rani Kusum)
- Post-amendment O8R1 is strict; no WS after 90 days.
- Accepting late WS rewards delay and derails timelines.
Respondent (Kanchan Devi & Ors.)
- Procedure should not kill defence; no penal bar is stated.
- Court’s discretion survives; justice needs flexibility.
Judgment
View Judgment Image- O8R1 is directory: It speeds up trials but does not bar defence absolutely.
- Discretion remains: Late WS may be allowed in exceptional cases with recorded reasons.
- O8R10 supports flexibility: Shows the Code’s design to permit suitable orders, not automatic decrees.
- But caution: No routine extensions; parties must show why delay was beyond control.
Result: Appeal dismissed; High Court and Trial Court orders upheld.
Ratio Decidendi
Procedure serves justice. In the absence of a penal bar, time limits for filing a WS are directory, subject to cautious judicial discretion.
Why It Matters
- Gives courts controlled flexibility to prevent miscarriage of justice.
- Guides trial courts on recording reasons for delay condonation.
- Exam-stable answer on O8R1 vs O8R10 balance.
Key Takeaways
- 1 O8R1 is directory; justice first.
- 2 No routine condonation—exceptional reasons only.
- 3 Record reasons; use O8R10 thoughtfully.
- 4 Procedure cannot defeat substantive rights.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook
Mnemonic: “TIME HELPS, NOT HURTS.”
- TIME → O8R1 sets timelines.
- HELPS → goal is speed, not penalty.
- NOT HURTS → courts may allow late WS in rare cases.
3-Step Hook:
- Check purpose: Is the rule procedural?
- Find penalty: Is a bar stated? (No → directory.)
- Apply discretion: Are reasons exceptional and recorded?
IRAC Outline
Issue
Is the 90-day cap in O8R1 CPC mandatory?
Rule
Procedural rules advance justice; no penalty → directory; O8R10 shows flexibility.
Application
Late WS allowed due to directory reading; court retains narrow discretion with reasons.
Conclusion
Directory, not mandatory; appeal dismissed; WS rightly accepted.
Glossary
- Order 8 Rule 1 CPC
- Fixes time for filing a written statement.
- Order 8 Rule 10 CPC
- Lets the court act if WS is not filed.
- Directory Provision
- Guides conduct; non-compliance is not always fatal.
- Mandatory Provision
- Must be obeyed strictly; breach leads to invalidity or penalty.
Student FAQs
No. Only exceptional, justified delays with reasons recorded by the court.
Not at all. Parties must try to meet timelines; discretion is narrow, not automatic.
It can act under O8R10, but must still apply its mind and pass a reasoned order.
Related Cases
Directory vs Mandatory
- How courts infer directory nature from purpose and penalties.
- Balancing speed with fairness to both sides.
Late Written Statements
- When extensions may be granted.
- Recording reasons and safeguarding the timetable.
Share
Related Post
Tags
Archive
Popular & Recent Post
Online Poll
Do whales live in the ocean?
Comment
Nothing for now