• Today: September 11, 2025

Distributive Justice: Concept and Application in Various Legal Systems

11 September, 2025
72354
Distributive Justice: Concept and Application in Various Legal Systems
1. Introduction
  • Distributive justice addresses the ownership and fair allocation of goods and resources in society.
  • It emphasizes collaboration and equitable distribution of resources for the "common good."
2. Meaning of Distributive Justice
  • Fair allocation of common goods (e.g., income, education, healthcare) and burdens (e.g., taxes).
  • Operates on principles of equity, equality, and social need.
  • Resources are distributed for community welfare, guided by political institutions and legal frameworks.
3. Objective of Distributive Justice
  • Ensures the common good by appropriately allocating roles and resources to individuals.
  • Recognizes unique needs and contributions of members, promoting societal prosperity.
4. John Rawls and Distributive Justice
  • Veil of Ignorance: Decisions are made without knowing one's societal status to ensure fairness.
  • Difference Principle: Goods should be distributed equally unless inequalities benefit the least advantaged.
5. Distributive Justice in Various Legal Systems
5.1. In the Indian Context
  • Reservation Policies:
    • Aimed at uplifting marginalized communities, validated by the Supreme Court (e.g., Mandal Commission Report).
  • Public Interest Litigation (PIL): Empowers citizens to seek judicial intervention for public welfare.
  • Environmental Principles:
    • Polluter Pays Principle: Ensures accountability for environmental damage.
    • Public Trust Doctrine: Protects public resources for collective benefit.
  • Case Law:
    • Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India: Established "due process of law" ensuring fairness.
    • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras: Broadened procedural rights to include justice.
5.2. In Other Legal Systems
  • Progressive tax systems, inheritance laws, and welfare programs in countries like the USA and UK reflect distributive justice.
  • International treaties address global inequalities (e.g., climate change and poverty alleviation).
6. Conclusion
  • Promotes equity, equality, and social need for fairness in resource allocation and societal responsibilities.
  • Addresses issues like poverty, education, and environmental sustainability.
  • Forms the foundation for societal development and a balanced, prosperous society.
Corrective Justice: Concept and Analysis
1. Meaning of Corrective Justice
  • Definition: Focuses on rectifying injustices caused by one party to another.
  • Aristotle’s View:
    • Explained in Nicomachean Ethics, corrective justice rectifies injustices in voluntary (contracts) or involuntary (torts) interactions.
2. Analysis of the Concept of Corrective Justice
  • Rectification Process:
    • Addresses both the wrongful gain of the defendant and the wrongful loss of the plaintiff.
    • Justice is achieved when the defendant surrenders the gain, and the plaintiff is compensated for the loss.
  • Correlativity Principle:
    • The injustice connects the plaintiff (victim) and defendant (wrongdoer).
    • The law reverses this injustice through remedies.
  • Comparison with Distributive Justice:
    • Corrective Justice: Focuses on two parties and corrects specific injustices.
    • Distributive Justice: Involves resource distribution among multiple parties for societal fairness.
  • J.Burnet’s Critique:
    • Justice operates differently in voluntary and involuntary interactions:
      • Voluntary: Ensures fair exchange.
      • Involuntary: Determines punishment proportional to harm caused.
3. Tort Law as Corrective Justice
  • Relation to Corrective Justice: Tort law addresses harm caused by one party to another, requiring compensation.
  • Aristotle’s Influence: Balances wrongful gains and losses in tort cases.
  • Key Features:
    • Local Scope: Tort cases focus on specific events.
    • Justice Intuition: Remedies satisfy the innate sense of justice.
  • Practical Application: Maintains fairness in legal transactions and remedies individual harms.
4. Conclusion
  • Purpose: Restores balance by addressing wrongful actions.
  • Legal Framework: Explains liability and remedies for resolving conflicts.
  • Significance:
    • Serves as a foundation for tort law and individual dispute resolution.
    • Provides a coherent framework for rectifying harm and maintaining societal balance.

Comment

Nothing for now