• Today: November 30, 2025

nalsa v union of india 2014

01 January, 1970
3451
NALSA v. Union of India (2014) — Third Gender & Transgender Rights Explained in Easy English
Supreme Court of India 2014 Bench: K.S. Radhakrishnan & A.K. Sikri, JJ. (2014) 5 SCC 438 Constitutional Law ≈ 6 min

National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) v. Union of India & Others (2014)

Supreme Court recognized transgender persons as the “third gender,” affirmed self-identification, and directed governments to ensure equality, dignity, and welfare.

Author: Gulzar Hashmi
Location: India
Published: 19 Aug 2025
Slug: nalsa-v-union-of-india-2014
NALSA v. Union of India (2014) - Supreme Court of India

Quick Summary

This judgment protects the dignity and equality of transgender persons. The Supreme Court said that transgender people are recognized as the third gender. A person may self-identify as male, female, or third gender without forced medical steps. Governments must prevent discrimination and create real support—education, jobs, healthcare, and safety.

  • Third gender recognized under the Constitution.
  • Right to self-identify gender is a fundamental right.
  • Directions for affirmative action and welfare schemes.

Issues

  1. Do transgender persons have a right to legal recognition as the “third gender”?
  2. Does denying recognition violate Articles 14, 15, 16, and 21?
  3. Is self-identification of gender protected by the Constitution?
  4. Are transgender persons entitled to affirmative action and welfare?
  5. What duties do the Union and States have to protect this community?

Rules (Constitutional Provisions)

  • Article 14 — Equality before law applies to all persons, including transgender persons.
  • Articles 15 & 16 — No discrimination on the ground of sex; includes gender identity. Equal opportunity in public employment.
  • Article 21 — Right to life with dignity includes the freedom to express one’s gender identity.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline illustration for NALSA v. Union of India
  • NALSA filed a petition for legal recognition of transgender persons.
  • Social activists, including Laxmi Narayan Tripathi and organizations, joined as petitioners.
  • The petition highlighted discrimination in education, jobs, healthcare, and daily life.
  • Violations were claimed under Articles 14, 15, 16, 21 of the Constitution.
  • Relief sought: recognition of a third gender and protection for transgender, hijra, and non-binary groups.

Arguments

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Gender identity is central to dignity and autonomy; law must see people as they see themselves.
  • Discrimination blocks basic rights: school, work, healthcare, housing, and safety.
  • Articles 14, 15, 16, 21 protect transgender persons; “sex” includes gender identity.
  • State must recognize third gender and create welfare schemes and reservations.

Respondents / State

  • Expressed practical concerns on classification and implementation.
  • Sought clarity on procedures for identification and benefits.
  • Accepted need for protection but emphasized policy steps by governments.

Judgment

The Supreme Court held that transgender persons are recognized as the third gender. The Court affirmed that a person’s self-identification of gender is protected by the Constitution.

  • Discrimination against transgender persons violates Articles 14, 15, 16, and 21.
  • Union and State Governments were directed to frame welfare schemes, ensure access to education, healthcare, and employment, and make public spaces safe.
  • Affirmative action, including reservations where appropriate, was directed to enable inclusion.
  • Awareness programs to reduce stigma were called for across institutions.
Judgment visual for NALSA v. Union of India (2014)

Ratio Decidendi

Gender identity is an essential part of personality. Equality and dignity demand legal recognition of diverse gender identities. “Sex” in Articles 15 and 16 covers gender identity; denial of recognition violates fundamental rights.

Why It Matters

  • First national recognition of third gender rights in India.
  • Shift from medical gatekeeping to self-identification.
  • Directs policy action for education, jobs, health, and safety.
  • Foundation for later LGBTQ+ rights developments.

Key Takeaways

Third gender recognized.

Self-identification protected.

Articles 14, 15, 16, 21 applied.

State duties: welfare & reservations.

Focus on dignity, safety, inclusion.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: NALSA = Name your gender, Affirm rights, Live with dignity, State must act, Affirmative action.”

  1. Recognize: Third gender status is valid in law.
  2. Respect: Self-identification is the rule.
  3. Reform: Government schemes and reservations push inclusion.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Whether transgender persons have a constitutional right to be recognized as the third gender and to self-identify without medical requirements.

Rule

Articles 14, 15, 16, 21 protect equality, non-discrimination, equal opportunity, and dignity. “Sex” includes gender identity.

Application

Denying recognition causes exclusion in schools, jobs, healthcare, and public life; it violates equality and dignity guarantees.

Conclusion

Transgender persons are third gender; self-identification is protected; governments must implement supportive measures and reservations.

Glossary

Third Gender
A legal gender category beyond male and female.
Self-identification
A person declares their own gender identity without mandatory medical proof.
Affirmative Action
Policy steps like reservations to improve real equality for a disadvantaged group.

FAQs

Transgender persons gained legal recognition as third gender. The State must remove barriers, prevent discrimination, and create welfare paths in education, jobs, and health.

No. The Court centered dignity and autonomy. Self-identification is the rule for legal recognition.

Articles 14, 15, 16, and 21—equality, non-discrimination, equal opportunity, and life with dignity cover gender identity.

Frame welfare schemes, provide reservations where suitable, ensure access to education, healthcare, jobs, and run anti-stigma programs.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Constitutional Law Fundamental Rights Equality & Dignity

Comment

Nothing for now