• Today: November 01, 2025

Union of India v. Harbhajan Singh Dhillon

01 November, 2025
1251
Union of India v. Harbhajan Singh Dhillon (1972) — Residuary Power & Entry 97 | The Law Easy

Union of India v. Harbhajan Singh Dhillon (AIR 1972 SC 1061)

```
Supreme Court of India 1972 AIR 1972 SC 1061 Constitutional Law Entry 97 (Residuary) ~7 min
Author: Gulzar Hashmi India Published: 25 Oct 2025 Slug: union-of-india-v-harbhajan-singh-dhillon
residuary power Entry 97 wealth tax agricultural land List I
Illustration for Union of India v. Harbhajan Singh Dhillon case
```
```

Quick Summary

Parliament included agricultural land within “assets” for wealth tax by amendments to the Wealth Tax Act. This was attacked as beyond Parliament’s power.

The Supreme Court upheld Parliament’s competence under Entry 97, List I (residuary power). Wealth tax targets net wealth, not land as land.

Residuary Power Applies Not a Land-Tax Central Competence Affirmed

Issues

  • Competence: Can Parliament, using residuary power, impose wealth tax that counts agricultural land?
  • Entry Placement: Does the Wealth Tax Act rest on Entry 86 or Entry 97 of List I?

Rules

  • Residuary power (Entry 97) covers subjects and taxes not found in Lists II or III.
  • Whoever holds residuary power, its scope does not change in content.
  • Constitution makers aimed for a strong Centre, giving Parliament wide residuary powers, including new taxes.

Facts (Timeline)

View Timeline Image
Timeline of Finance Act 1969 and litigation path
1957: Wealth Tax Act enacted to tax net wealth of individuals, HUFs, etc.
1969: Finance Act amended the Act to include agricultural land within “assets”.
Challenge: Petitioners argued Parliament lacked competence; land-related taxation lies with States.
Core Claim: The measure was said to violate the constitutional scheme and Entry 86 limits.
Result: Supreme Court examined Entries 86 and 97, and upheld Parliament’s power.

Arguments

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Taxing agricultural land is a State subject; Centre cannot indirectly do it.
  • Wealth tax including agricultural land conflicts with the federal scheme.
  • Entry 86 cannot support inclusion of agricultural land.

Respondent / Union of India

  • Wealth tax is on net wealth, not on land as a unit of taxation.
  • If no entry fits, Entry 97 (residuary) empowers Parliament to legislate and tax.
  • Central fiscal power must meet modern needs beyond listed items.
Judgment highlight for Dhillon case

The Supreme Court rejected the challenge and sustained the law under Entry 97 (List I). Parliament had competence through the residuary field.

The levy is on wealth. Agricultural land may be part of wealth, but the tax is not a direct tax on land as land.

Ratio

  • Entry 97 empowers Parliament to legislate and tax on subjects not covered elsewhere.
  • Wealth tax targets the aggregate value of assets, not a specific property unit.
  • Residuary power remains the same in content regardless of who holds it; in India, it vests in Parliament.

Why It Matters

The case clarifies Centre–State fiscal lines. It confirms a strong central residuary field, useful for new forms of taxation not listed in the Constitution.

Key Takeaways

  1. Entry 97 (residuary) validates Parliament’s competence when other entries are silent.
  2. Wealth tax is on net wealth—agricultural land can be counted within it.
  3. Residuary power supports modern fiscal tools beyond the original lists.
  4. Federal balance is kept: States regulate agriculture; Centre may tax unlisted subjects.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “DHILLON = Does High Income List Leave Out New-tax?” → Use Entry 97.

  1. Scan Lists: Check Lists I–III for a matching entry.
  2. If Silent: Move to Entry 97 (residuary).
  3. Test Nature: Is it wealth-wide, not a specific land tax?

IRAC Outline

Issue

Is Parliament competent to include agricultural land in net wealth for wealth tax?

Rule

Residuary Entry 97 permits legislation and taxation on subjects not found in other lists.

Application

Wealth tax is on aggregate wealth. Agricultural land’s value may be included without converting it into a land tax.

Conclusion

Parliament is competent under Entry 97; the challenge fails.

Glossary

Residuary Power
Power over subjects and taxes not listed elsewhere in the Constitution.
Entry 97 (List I)
Union List entry giving Parliament authority over unlisted matters and taxes.
Wealth Tax
A levy on the net wealth of a person, considering all assets minus debts.

FAQs

No. Wealth tax looks at total wealth. It may count land value, but it is not a tax on land as a separate unit.

Because no other entry cleanly covered this tax design. Entry 97 fills gaps and supports central laws on new or unlisted subjects.

No. States keep control of agriculture policy. The case only clarifies Parliament’s residuary taxing power when lists are silent.

If a tax does not fit named entries, argue Entry 97. Show the levy’s true nature (wealth-wide vs. specific property tax).
© 2025 The Law Easy • All rights reserved.

Comment

Nothing for now