• Today: November 01, 2025

Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal & Others (1967)

01 November, 2025
1151
Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal (1967) — Article 12 “State” Test | The Law Easy

Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal & Others (1967)

Article 12 — “State” & “Other Authorities” • Equality in Promotions (Arts. 14 & 16)

Supreme Court of India 1967 Constitutional Law AIR 1967 SC 1857 ~7 min read India
Author: Gulzar Hashmi · Published: · Slug: rajasthan-state-electricity-board-v-mohan-lal-and-others-1967
Hero image for Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal case explainer

Quick Summary

The case explains when a statutory body counts as “State” under Article 12. The Supreme Court said that “other authorities” covers bodies like the Rajasthan State Electricity Board because the law gives them public powers. Even if they do commercial work, they still fall under the Constitution and must follow Articles 14 and 16.

  • Core idea: Legal power from statute → “Authority” → Part of “State”.
  • Result: Promotion decisions must respect equality and fairness.
```

Issues

  1. Does the Rajasthan State Electricity Board fall within “other authorities” under Article 12?
  2. If yes, must its promotion actions satisfy Articles 14 and 16?

Rules

Article 12: “The State” includes Government and other authorities within India.

The Court held: authorities in Article 12 include constitutional or statutory bodies on whom law confers powers. Commercial activity does not exclude Article 12 status.

Facts (Timeline)

View Image
Timeline of events in the Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal case
Before 1958: Electricity supply was run by the State’s Electrical & Mechanical Department. Mohan Lal and others were foremen there.
12 Feb 1958: Government placed many employees provisionally at the Board’s disposal; staff could choose new Board service rules, keep old ones (except conduct/discipline), or seek pension/gratuity.
10 Aug 1960: Government treated Mohan Lal and others as on deputation to the Board.
24 Nov 1962 → 25 Jul 1963: Mohan Lal was reverted to parent department (effective 1 Dec 1962); deputation extended till 25 Jul 1963.
11 Jul 1963: Reverted to the Board; posted as foreman. Meanwhile, some juniors were promoted as Assistant Engineers by the Board; Mohan Lal was promoted as Assistant Engineer in PWD.
Writ Filed: Mohan Lal sought equal consideration for promotion; alleged violation of Articles 14 & 16.
High Court: Allowed the petition; quashed promotions; directed fresh consideration.
Appeal: Board appealed to the Supreme Court.

Arguments

Appellant: Electricity Board

  • Mohan Lal was never a permanent Board servant; no right to be considered with Board staff.
  • The Board is not “State” under Article 12; hence, writ principles under Arts. 14 & 16 do not apply.

Respondent: Mohan Lal

  • Board exercised statutory powers; it is an “authority” under Article 12.
  • Promotion must follow equality norms; juniors were promoted over him.

The Supreme Court upheld that “other authorities” in Article 12 includes constitutional or statutory bodies with powers granted by law. Commercial work does not remove Article 12 status.

Therefore, the Board falls within “State,” and its promotion decisions must follow equality guarantees under Articles 14 and 16.

Ratio Decidendi

If a body is created by statute and holds legal power to act for public purposes, it is an “authority” under Article 12. The nature of its function (even trade or business) does not change this status.

Why It Matters

  • Sets a broad and practical test for Article 12.
  • Keeps statutory bodies answerable to equality and fairness.
  • Supports public accountability even when bodies do commercial work.

Key Takeaways

  • Statute + Public Power = Authority.
  • Commercial work ≠ Exit from Article 12.
  • Equality rules apply to promotions and service matters.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “SPA: Statute–Power–Accountable”

  1. Statute creates the body.
  2. Power is legal and public in nature.
  3. Accountable under Articles 14 & 16.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Is the Board an “authority” under Article 12?

Rule: Statutory bodies with conferred powers are “authorities,” even if engaged in trade.

Application: The Board was created by law and exercised public powers; equality norms apply.

Conclusion: The Board is “State.” Its promotion decisions must meet Articles 14 & 16.

Glossary

Article 12
Defines “State” for Part III rights.
Authority
A body with legal power given by statute.
Deputation
Temporary service in another department/body.

FAQs

Whether the Electricity Board is an “authority” under Article 12 so that its actions must follow fundamental rights.

No. Commercial activity does not remove Article 12 status because the Constitution itself allows State trade.

The Board is “State” under Article 12; its promotion decisions are subject to equality under Articles 14 and 16.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Constitutional Law Service Law Public Authority

Comment

Nothing for now