Re: The Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves (AIR 1962 SC 845)
- Gulzar Hashmi
- India
- Published: 25 Oct 2025
- Berubari Union, Article 3, Article 368
Quick Summary
This advisory opinion answers a simple but powerful question: can Parliament transfer Indian territory to a foreign country by using Article 3 (state boundaries), or must it amend the Constitution under Article 368? The Supreme Court said: you need a constitutional amendment. Article 3 covers internal changes between Indian states; it does not cover handing land to a foreign state. The advice guided India to pass a constitutional amendment before implementing the India–Pakistan enclave agreement concerning the Berubari Union.
Issues
- Is legislative action needed to implement the Berubari agreement?
- If yes, is a law under Article 3 enough, or is an amendment under Article 368 necessary?
- For exchanging enclaves, should Parliament act under Article 3, Article 368, or both?
Rules
- Article 3(c) allows Parliament to diminish the area of any state. This power is about internal re-arrangement within India.
- Article 368 empowers Parliament to amend the Constitution. Where an action affects the territory of India as a whole, or changes what the Constitution assumes as “India,” Article 368 is the route.
Therefore, even the broadest reading of Article 3 cannot justify transferring Indian territory to a foreign state. For the Berubari enclave exchange, a constitutional amendment is required.
Facts (Timeline)
View Timeline
Partition & Boundary Commission: Bengal and Punjab were to be partitioned; a boundary commission was set up.
Radcliffe Line Fixed: Disputes later arose on exact apportionment between India and Pakistan.
Jalpaiguri Apportionment: Some thanas to India, others to Pakistan; Berubari Union No. 12 was omitted but later treated as part of India.
Agreement Reached: To settle the dispute, half of Berubari to Pakistan; half to remain with India.
Presidential Reference: President asked the Supreme Court if Parliament could transfer territory and what procedure must be followed.
Arguments
Appellant / Government View
- Article 3 is broad and permits diminishing state areas, so Parliament can implement the agreement.
- People’s convenience and international commitments support implementation.
Respondent / Opposing View
- Article 3 is limited to internal adjustments; it cannot transfer territory to a foreign state.
- Exchanging enclaves changes India’s territory; thus, the Constitution must be amended under Article 368.
Judgment (Advisory Opinion)
Judgment VisualLegislative action is necessary to give effect to the agreement. A simple law under Article 3 is not enough. Because the agreement transfers Indian territory to a foreign state, a constitutional amendment under Article 368 is required.
Ratio Decidendi
Article 3 speaks to state boundaries within India; it does not authorize ceding Indian territory abroad. Any transfer to a foreign state alters the constitutional description of India’s territory and therefore needs an Article 368 amendment.
Why It Matters
- Clear boundary between internal and external changes: Internal state changes ≠ international cession.
- Democratic safeguard: Constitutional amendment ensures deeper scrutiny and consensus.
- Policy guidance: Set the path later used to regularize enclave exchanges through amendment.
Key Takeaways
- Article 3 is for intra-India state boundary changes.
- Handing any Indian territory to a foreign state needs Article 368.
- Parliament must pass a constitutional amendment before implementing such agreements.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook
Mnemonic: “3 is Inside, 368 is Outside.”
- Inside? State-to-state reshuffle → Article 3.
- Outside? To foreign state → Article 368.
- Therefore: Berubari exchange → Amendment first.
IRAC Outline
| Issue | Whether Parliament can implement the Berubari enclave exchange using Article 3, or needs a constitutional amendment under Article 368. |
|---|---|
| Rule | Article 3 deals with internal state boundaries; Article 368 is required for changes that affect India’s territory in relation to foreign states. |
| Application | Exchange of enclaves gives part of Indian territory to Pakistan. That is beyond Article 3; it alters India’s territory externally—thus Article 368 applies. |
| Conclusion | Pass a constitutional amendment under Article 368 to lawfully execute the agreement. |
Glossary
- Enclave
- A land area of one country surrounded by the territory of another.
- Advisory Opinion
- The Supreme Court’s opinion on a question referred by the President; it guides but does not operate as a decree.
- Cession
- Transfer of sovereignty over territory from one state to another.
FAQs
Related Cases
- In Re: The Berubari Union (Presidential Reference) — Advisory opinion groundwork.
- 9th Constitutional Amendment — Enabling framework for implementation.
- Later India–Bangladesh Land Boundary Agreement matters for enclave resolution context.
Case Meta
| CASE_TITLE | Re: The Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves (AIR 1962 SC 845) |
|---|---|
| PRIMARY_KEYWORDS | Berubari Union case, Article 3 vs Article 368, exchange of enclaves |
| SECONDARY_KEYWORDS | Supreme Court advisory opinion, Radcliffe Line, constitutional amendment, cession of territory, India–Pakistan agreement |
| PUBLISH_DATE | 2025-10-25 |
| AUTHOR_NAME | Gulzar Hashmi |
| LOCATION | India |
| SLUG | the-berubari-union-and-exchange-of-enclaves |
| CANONICAL | https://thelaweasy.com/the-berubari-union-and-exchange-of-enclaves/ |
Share
Tags
Archive
Popular & Recent Post
Comment
Nothing for now