• Today: November 01, 2025

Re: The Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves

01 November, 2025
851
Berubari Union Case Explained (Article 3 vs Article 368) | The Law Easy

Re: The Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves (AIR 1962 SC 845)

Supreme Court of India 1962 (Advisory) Bench: 8-Judge Citation: AIR 1962 SC 845 Constitutional Law 6–8 min read
  • Gulzar Hashmi
  • India
  • Published: 25 Oct 2025
  • Berubari Union, Article 3, Article 368
Illustration of India–Pakistan enclaves and a gavel symbolizing the Berubari Union case

Quick Summary

This advisory opinion answers a simple but powerful question: can Parliament transfer Indian territory to a foreign country by using Article 3 (state boundaries), or must it amend the Constitution under Article 368? The Supreme Court said: you need a constitutional amendment. Article 3 covers internal changes between Indian states; it does not cover handing land to a foreign state. The advice guided India to pass a constitutional amendment before implementing the India–Pakistan enclave agreement concerning the Berubari Union.

Issues

  • Is legislative action needed to implement the Berubari agreement?
  • If yes, is a law under Article 3 enough, or is an amendment under Article 368 necessary?
  • For exchanging enclaves, should Parliament act under Article 3, Article 368, or both?

Rules

  • Article 3(c) allows Parliament to diminish the area of any state. This power is about internal re-arrangement within India.
  • Article 368 empowers Parliament to amend the Constitution. Where an action affects the territory of India as a whole, or changes what the Constitution assumes as “India,” Article 368 is the route.

Therefore, even the broadest reading of Article 3 cannot justify transferring Indian territory to a foreign state. For the Berubari enclave exchange, a constitutional amendment is required.

Facts (Timeline)

View Timeline
Timeline graphic for the Berubari Union case and enclave exchange

Partition & Boundary Commission: Bengal and Punjab were to be partitioned; a boundary commission was set up.

Radcliffe Line Fixed: Disputes later arose on exact apportionment between India and Pakistan.

Jalpaiguri Apportionment: Some thanas to India, others to Pakistan; Berubari Union No. 12 was omitted but later treated as part of India.

Agreement Reached: To settle the dispute, half of Berubari to Pakistan; half to remain with India.

Presidential Reference: President asked the Supreme Court if Parliament could transfer territory and what procedure must be followed.

Arguments

Appellant / Government View

  • Article 3 is broad and permits diminishing state areas, so Parliament can implement the agreement.
  • People’s convenience and international commitments support implementation.

Respondent / Opposing View

  • Article 3 is limited to internal adjustments; it cannot transfer territory to a foreign state.
  • Exchanging enclaves changes India’s territory; thus, the Constitution must be amended under Article 368.

Judgment (Advisory Opinion)

Judgment Visual

Legislative action is necessary to give effect to the agreement. A simple law under Article 3 is not enough. Because the agreement transfers Indian territory to a foreign state, a constitutional amendment under Article 368 is required.

Court judgment themed image for the Berubari Union case

Ratio Decidendi

Article 3 speaks to state boundaries within India; it does not authorize ceding Indian territory abroad. Any transfer to a foreign state alters the constitutional description of India’s territory and therefore needs an Article 368 amendment.

Why It Matters

  • Clear boundary between internal and external changes: Internal state changes ≠ international cession.
  • Democratic safeguard: Constitutional amendment ensures deeper scrutiny and consensus.
  • Policy guidance: Set the path later used to regularize enclave exchanges through amendment.

Key Takeaways

  1. Article 3 is for intra-India state boundary changes.
  2. Handing any Indian territory to a foreign state needs Article 368.
  3. Parliament must pass a constitutional amendment before implementing such agreements.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “3 is Inside, 368 is Outside.”

  1. Inside? State-to-state reshuffle → Article 3.
  2. Outside? To foreign state → Article 368.
  3. Therefore: Berubari exchange → Amendment first.

IRAC Outline

Issue Whether Parliament can implement the Berubari enclave exchange using Article 3, or needs a constitutional amendment under Article 368.
Rule Article 3 deals with internal state boundaries; Article 368 is required for changes that affect India’s territory in relation to foreign states.
Application Exchange of enclaves gives part of Indian territory to Pakistan. That is beyond Article 3; it alters India’s territory externally—thus Article 368 applies.
Conclusion Pass a constitutional amendment under Article 368 to lawfully execute the agreement.

Glossary

Enclave
A land area of one country surrounded by the territory of another.
Advisory Opinion
The Supreme Court’s opinion on a question referred by the President; it guides but does not operate as a decree.
Cession
Transfer of sovereignty over territory from one state to another.

FAQs

While drawing the Radcliffe Line, Berubari Union No. 12 was left unclear. Later, both sides disputed it, leading to an agreement to split the area.

Because Article 3 is about changes among Indian states. Ceding land to a foreign state changes India’s territory externally, which needs Article 368.

AIR 1962 SC 845 — Re: The Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves.

Write the Issue (Art. 3 vs 368), the Rule (3=internal; 368=external), the Application (enclave transfer), and the Conclusion (needs amendment).

Parliament proceeded through the constitutional amendment route to enable implementation of the enclave agreement.

Case Meta

CASE_TITLERe: The Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves (AIR 1962 SC 845)
PRIMARY_KEYWORDSBerubari Union case, Article 3 vs Article 368, exchange of enclaves
SECONDARY_KEYWORDSSupreme Court advisory opinion, Radcliffe Line, constitutional amendment, cession of territory, India–Pakistan agreement
PUBLISH_DATE2025-10-25
AUTHOR_NAMEGulzar Hashmi
LOCATIONIndia
SLUGthe-berubari-union-and-exchange-of-enclaves
CANONICALhttps://thelaweasy.com/the-berubari-union-and-exchange-of-enclaves/
Constitutional Law Territory Landmark

Reviewed by The Law Easy

```

© 2025 The Law Easy • Easy English Case Explainers

Articles Cases Students

Comment

Nothing for now