What was decided in R. C. Poudyal v. Union of India?

The Supreme Court (5-judge bench) upheld special seat arrangements in Sikkim but warned that conditions under Article 371F cannot clash with the constitutional scheme of equality.

Why was one seat reserved for the Sangha?

Historically, the Sangha (Buddhist monastic community) had a special position in Sikkim. The Parliament continued this practice through Article 371F, creating a dedicated Sangha seat.

Does the case allow religion-based reservations generally?

No. The ruling is context-specific to Sikkim’s admission terms. It does not open the door to general religion-based reservations across India.

What is Article 371F?

It contains special provisions for Sikkim after it joined India in 1975, including power to continue unique electoral arrangements to protect local groups.