• Today: January 10, 2026

Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com

04 November, 2025
8451
Perfect 10 v. Amazon (508 F.3d 1146) — Inline Linking, Thumbnails & Fair Use | The Law Easy
```

Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (508 F.3d 1146)

Inline linking, thumbnails, and safe harbor — an easy guide to how courts handle images in search and on platforms.

9th Cir. (USA) 2007 Appellate Panel 508 F.3d 1146 Copyright ~7 min read
CASE_TITLE: Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: Perfect 10 v Amazon, inline linking, thumbnails, fair use SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: server test, display right, DMCA safe harbor PUBLISH_DATE: 2025-11-01 AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi LOCATION: India slug: perfect-10-inc-v-amazon-com
Illustration representing Perfect 10 v. Amazon: search results and image linking
```

Quick Summary

This case explains three big ideas: (1) small preview images (thumbnails) in search can be fair use; (2) if you store and send the image file, you can violate the display right; (3) simply linking or framing a full-size image hosted on another server does not by itself distribute that image.

  • Search thumbnails = transformative help for users → can be fair use.
  • Hosting and transmitting the file = potential display infringement.
  • Inline linking/framing = no distribution if file sits on a third-party server.
  • Platforms may get DMCA safe harbor if they act on valid notices quickly.

Issues

  1. Does a computer owner who stores an image and sends it to users violate the copyright holder’s exclusive display right?
  2. Does a computer owner who inline links to or frames a full-size image infringe the distribution right when the image shows on the user’s screen?

Rules

  • Thumbnail Fair Use: Using copyrighted images as thumbnails in search results can be fair use, even for commercial services, due to their transformative role.
  • Display Right: If you store the image and transmit the electronic file, you can violate the owner’s exclusive display right.
  • Inline Linking/Framing: Showing a full-size image via inline linking or framing does not by itself infringe the distribution right if the file stays on a third-party server.

Facts (Timeline)

Perfect 10’s Photos

Perfect 10 published photos of models online and claimed copyright in those images.

Search Thumbnails

The search engine used by Amazon showed thumbnails that sometimes matched Perfect 10’s photos.

Inline Linking

Search results could load or frame full-size images that were actually stored on other websites’ servers.

Lawsuit

Perfect 10 sued, arguing that showing thumbnails and linking/framing full-size images infringed its rights.

Timeline graphic for Perfect 10 v. Amazon case events

Arguments

Appellant: Perfect 10
  • Thumbnails copy the images and harm licensing markets.
  • Inline linking and framing make full-size images appear as if hosted by the service.
  • Platforms should be liable when their systems help users view infringing content.
Respondent: Amazon
  • Thumbnails are transformative aids to search; users benefit.
  • For full-size images, files sit on third-party servers; we do not distribute them.
  • On notice, we act — qualifying for DMCA safe harbor.

Judgment (Held)

The court ruled for Amazon on core points. Thumbnails could be fair use. A service that stores and sends an image may violate the display right. But inline linking or framing of full-size images that are hosted elsewhere does not, by itself, distribute those images. Amazon also qualified for DMCA safe harbor because it removed or disabled access after proper notices.

Judgment visual for Perfect 10 v. Amazon

Ratio Decidendi

Server test: The entity that stores and serves the image file displays it. Search thumbnails can be fair use because they transform the original purpose by helping users locate information. Inline linking and framing do not equal distribution when the service never transmits the file itself.

Why It Matters

  • Guides Search Engines: Thumbnails help users and can be lawful.
  • Clarifies Linking: Linking/framing ≠ distributing when you do not host the file.
  • Platform Safety: DMCA compliance can protect intermediaries.

Key Takeaways

  • Thumbnails → can be fair use (transformative).
  • Hosting & sending files → risk of display infringement.
  • Inline linking/framing → no distribution if not hosting.
  • Follow DMCA takedown → safe harbor possible.
  • Focus on where the image is stored and served.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “Show? Server. Small? Search. Safe? Swift.”

  1. Show? Server: Who stores & serves the file is the displayer.
  2. Small? Search: Thumbnails aid search → fair use possible.
  3. Safe? Swift: Swift DMCA response → safe harbor.

IRAC Outline

Issue Whether thumbnails, inline linking, and hosting practices infringe display/distribution rights.
Rule Thumbnails can be fair use; hosting & sending can infringe display; inline linking/framing is not distribution without hosting.
Application Search thumbnails served transformative goals; full-size images were hosted by others; platform acted on DMCA notices.
Conclusion Relief denied against Amazon on key issues; safe harbor applied; principles clarified for web services.

Glossary

Inline Linking
Showing an image from another server inside your page without hosting it yourself.
Thumbnail
A small preview image that helps users identify content in search.
DMCA Safe Harbor
Legal protection for platforms that act quickly on valid takedown notices.

FAQs

Not always. Here, search thumbnails served a different purpose (helping users find info), which supported fair use.

If the image file is never on your server, framing alone is not distribution. The host that serves the file is responsible.

Ask: who stores and sends the file to the user? That party is the “displayer.”

Keep a notice system, act quickly on valid notices, and remove or disable access to reported content.

This case focuses on display/distribution. Other laws and facts may apply. Linking can still lead to issues depending on context.

Reviewed by The Law Easy

Copyright Internet Law Safe Harbor
```
Decorative court and web imagery for Perfect 10 v. Amazon

Comment

Nothing for now