Why did the Supreme Court cancel bail in Ash Mohammad?

Because the High Court ignored the accused’s heavy criminal history, the gravity of offences, and the risk to society and witnesses.

Do past cases matter while granting bail?

Yes. Courts weigh criminal antecedents along with gravity, evidence, and risk of tampering or absconding.

Is long custody enough to get bail in grave crimes?

No. Duration in custody cannot override serious societal concerns and risks in heinous offences.

What did the Court order finally?

It set aside the High Court’s order, cancelled bail, directed immediate surrender, and told the agency to take custody if needed.

Ash Mohammad v. Shiv Raj Singh

```

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court cancelled bail granted by the High Court to a history-sheeter in a kidnapping case. It said bail discretion must weigh the gravity of the offence, the accused’s criminal record, the risk to society and witnesses, and the material on record. Long custody alone is not a reason to ignore these factors. Result: bail set aside; surrender ordered.

Issues

Did the High Court ignore criminal antecedents and gravity while granting bail?
Can “time spent in custody” override societal concerns in serious crimes?
Was bail justified despite numerous pending serious cases against the accused?

Rules

Bail discretion: Consider gravity, nature of accusation, criminal history, evidence strength, risk of tampering, public interest.
Perverse/unreasoned orders: Can be set aside in appeal/interference.
Liberty vs society: In heinous crimes, individual liberty yields to societal safety and justice needs.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline for Ash Mohammad case: FIR, custody, bail orders, and Supreme Court

29 May 2011: FIR alleges abduction of Bihari Lal; threats and 8-day confinement claimed.

Charge: IPC Sections 364 & 506; accused arrested; is a history-sheeter with 50+ cases.

Sessions Court: Bail rejected—grave offence, Sec. 164 statement, heavy antecedents.

High Court: Bail granted citing ~7 months custody, with conditions.

Supreme Court: On appeal, cancels bail—HC ignored gravity and societal risk.

Arguments

Appellant (Ash Mohammad)

HC underplayed gravity and the accused’s long criminal record.
Real risk of threats and interference with evidence.
Custody length cannot trump public safety in such crimes.

Respondent (Accused)

Long custody and conditions mitigate risks.
No final finding of guilt; presumption of innocence.
Parity with other bail decisions in similar matters.

Judgment

Bail cancelled: HC failed to consider criminal antecedents, gravity, and societal risk.
Discretion cautioned: Bail in heinous crimes needs strict scrutiny.
Direction: Immediate surrender; agency to secure custody if not complied.
Note: Observations limited to bail; trial to remain uninfluenced.

Ratio

When the accused has heavy criminal antecedents and the charge is grave, courts must prioritise societal interest and the integrity of justice. Custody duration alone cannot justify bail if risks remain high.

Why It Matters

Sets a clear checklist for bail in serious crimes.
Shows how antecedents can tip the balance against bail.
Protects witnesses and investigation from habitual offenders.

Key Takeaways

Gravity + History matter: Both weigh strongly against bail.
Societal safety: Can override custody duration.
Reasoned orders: Bail orders must show application of mind.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “A-S-H = Antecedents, Seriousness, Harm-risk.”

Antecedents: Check history-sheeter record.
Seriousness: Weigh gravity and punishment.
Harm-risk: Look for threat to society/witnesses.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Whether HC rightly granted bail despite grave charges and the accused’s heavy criminal record.

Rule

Bail needs a reasoned balance of liberty and public safety; consider gravity, antecedents, evidence, and tampering risks.

Application

HC focused on custody time and ignored serious risks from a history-sheeter; materials indicated threat to justice.

Conclusion

Bail cancelled; surrender ordered; comments limited to bail stage.

Glossary

History-sheeter: A person with a long, documented record of criminal cases.
Perverse Order: A bail order passed by ignoring key factors or without reasons.
Section 164 CrPC: Statement before a magistrate; often crucial in bail consideration.