What was the main issue in M.C. Mehta (1992)?

Whether the State must actively promote environmental awareness, including via cinema, broadcasting, and compulsory education.

What did the Supreme Court direct cinema halls to do?

Show at least two environmental protection slides in every show; materials to be prepared by the Environment Ministry.

What was ordered to TV and Radio?

Doordarshan and AIR must air daily environmental content and weekly longer programs to educate the public.

Is environmental education compulsory after this case?

Yes. The Court directed UGC and State Boards to make environmental studies compulsory at all levels.

Which constitutional duty supports the ruling?

Article 51A(g) — the duty of every citizen to protect and improve the environment.

mc-mehta-v-union-of-india-1992-supreme-court

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India

Supreme Court of India • AIR 1992 SC 382 • India

Environmental Law Article 51A(g) Supreme Court 1992 ~7 min read AIR 1992 SC 382

```

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court treated environmental awareness as a shared duty. Laws work only when people understand and accept them. The Court directed cinemas, TV, radio, and the education system to spread environmental messages. Environmental studies were made compulsory so that citizens learn and follow eco-duties from a young age.

Issues

Does the State have a constitutional duty to promote environmental awareness?
Can the State mandate cinemas and public broadcasters to carry environmental messages?
Should environmental education be compulsory at all levels?

Rules

Acceptance + Awareness: Laws succeed when people understand and voluntarily follow them.
Regulation in Public Interest: The State may attach conditions to regulated businesses to serve social welfare.
Education as Compliance Tool: Teaching environmental duty builds lasting, law-abiding behaviour.

Facts (Timeline)

India

Timeline for M.C. Mehta environmental awareness directives

1972–1986: New environmental laws (Water 1974; Air 1981; EPA 1986).

1976: Article 51A(g) adds citizens’ duty to protect environment.

1991: M.C. Mehta files PIL under Article 32 seeking awareness measures.

Govt Support: Attorney General backs education and media routes.

1992 Judgment: Court issues binding awareness and education directives.

Arguments

Petitioner (M.C. Mehta)

Environmental laws fail without public awareness.
State and media must spread clear eco-messages.
Make environmental studies compulsory in all institutions.

Respondent (Union of India)

Supported awareness via cinema, TV, and radio.
Backed compulsory environmental education.
Agreed to prepare materials and programming.

Judgment

State has a constitutional duty to promote environmental awareness (Art. 51A(g)).
Mandates on cinemas and public broadcasters are valid in public interest.
Environmental education to be compulsory at all levels.
Binding directions issued to MoEF, I&B Ministry, Doordarshan, AIR, UGC, and State Boards.

Ratio Decidendi

Law + Education: Durable compliance flows from informed citizens; the Constitution supports awareness-building.

Regulatory Levers: The State may guide regulated platforms to deliver messages that advance public welfare.

Why It Matters

Transforms environmental duty into daily learning and media practice.
Links constitutional duty with real-world education tools.
Model PIL showing preventive, not just punitive, solutions.

Key Takeaways

Awareness is essential for effective environmental law.
Public interest regulation can require educational content.
Compulsory curricula embed eco-responsibility early.
Coordination across ministries and boards is mandated.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “See, Hear, Learn” (SHL)

See — Cinema slides every show.
Hear — Daily radio/TV messages + weekly programs.
Learn — Compulsory environmental studies in all institutions.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Can the Court mandate awareness through cinemas/media and make environmental education compulsory?

Rule: Public interest regulation + Article 51A(g) + education as a compliance tool.

Application: Messages via regulated platforms and curricula build informed, law-abiding conduct nationwide.

Conclusion: Yes. Directives issued to ministries, broadcasters, UGC, and boards for immediate compliance.

Glossary

Article 51A(g): Citizen’s duty to protect and improve the environment.
Public Interest Regulation: Conditions on regulated businesses to advance social welfare.
UGC: University Grants Commission; oversees higher education standards.