• Today: November 02, 2025

Jayaram Mudaliar v. Ayyaswamy

02 November, 2025
301
Jayaram Mudaliar v. Ayyaswamy (AIR 1973 SC 569) — Lis Pendens & Section 52 TPA | The Law Easy

Jayaram Mudaliar v. Ayyaswamy

Easy English explainer on lis pendens under Section 52 TPA—what happens to sales while a property case is pending?

Supreme Court of India 1973 AIR 1973 SC 569 Property Law ~6 min read
Author: Gulzar Hashmi India Published: 1 Nov 2025
Illustration for Jayaram Mudaliar v. Ayyaswamy on lis pendens
```

Quick Summary

Core idea: When a property case is pending, Section 52 TPA (lis pendens) prevents parties from doing deals that affect the rights of others in that case. Here, a purchase made during a partition suit was hit by lis pendens.

Outcome (easy words): The sale was treated as a voluntary alienation during litigation; lis pendens applied. The appeal failed.

Issues

  • Does lis pendens apply to the impugned sale?
  • Are public auctions exempt from Section 52 TPA?

Rules

  • Section 52 TPA (lis pendens): Applies not only to formal transfers, but also to any dealings by a party that can affect another party’s rights in the same litigation.
  • Outside agency exception: If an independent authority proceeds against the property (without a litigating party triggering it), Section 52 may not affect that transaction.

Facts — Timeline

View Image

1958 Respondent Ayyaswamy files a partition suit, impleading the appellant Jayaram and Munniswami as co-defendants.

During suit Jayaram buys land from Munniswami (his mother-in-law) at a public auction to help clear her debts.

Challenge Ayyaswamy sues, saying the sale of joint property is hit by Section 52 (lis pendens).

High Court Treats the sale as voluntary alienation; says no exemption from lis pendens for such sales.

Arguments

Appellant (Jayaram)

  • Purchase through public auction to discharge debts; should be outside Section 52.
  • Claims benefit of an outside agency proceeding.

Respondent (Ayyaswamy)

  • Lis pendens attaches to dealings by parties during pending litigation.
  • This sale is a voluntary act linked to a litigating party; Section 52 applies.

Judgment

Judgment illustration

Held: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. The sale was subject to lis pendens. The doctrine aims to stop parties in pending litigation from acquiring rights in the disputed property so as to prejudice other parties.

Clarification: The outside agency exception applies where an independent authority proceeds against the property without a litigant’s provocation. That was not the case here.

Ratio Decidendi

  • Section 52 covers not only formal transfers but also other dealings by a litigating party that can affect rival rights.
  • A sale conducted in connection with a litigating party during the suit is hit by lis pendens.
  • Exemption exists only for actions of a truly independent outside agency—not triggered by a party.

Why It Matters

The case teaches that buyers must check for pending litigation. A deal made during a suit can be unsafe and later ineffective against the winning party.

Key Takeaways

  1. Pending suit = red flag: Lis pendens can bind later purchasers.
  2. Voluntary sales by parties during the suit are usually hit by Section 52.
  3. Outside agency exception is narrow and fact-specific.
  4. Always run a litigation search before purchase.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: Stop Party Sales” (S-P-S).

  1. Spot a pending case on the property.
  2. Probe if the sale is by/through a litigating party (then Section 52 hits).
  3. Scan for an outside agency action—only then may there be an exception.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Does Section 52 TPA (lis pendens) apply to a sale made during a pending partition suit? Are public auctions exempt?

Rule

Section 52 binds dealings by parties that affect rights in the suit; an independent outside agency may fall outside the bar.

Application

The sale arose from a party-linked transaction during the suit. It was a voluntary alienation, not an independent agency action.

Conclusion

Lis pendens applied; the appeal was dismissed.

Glossary

Lis Pendens
“Suit pending.” Doctrine that restrains party dealings with disputed property during litigation.
Voluntary Alienation
A sale/transfer done by a party of their own will, not forced by an outside authority.
Outside Agency
Independent authority (e.g., statutory recovery) acting without a litigant’s trigger; may escape Section 52.

FAQs

It stops parties in a pending property case from making transfers or other dealings that can harm the other party’s rights in that property.

No. Only when an independent outside agency acts without a party’s trigger. If a party’s voluntary sale occurs, Section 52 can still apply.

To preserve the property status while the court decides. It avoids unfair changes to rights during the case.

Check if any litigation is pending. A purchase during a suit may be unsafe due to Section 52.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Lis Pendens Section 52 TPA Voluntary Alienation
Slug: jayaram-mudaliar-v-ayyaswamy
```

Comment

Nothing for now