• Today: November 02, 2025

Sivayogeswara Cotton Press v. M. Panchaksharappa

02 November, 2025
251

Sivayogeswara Cotton Press v. M. Panchaksharappa

Sivayogeswara Cotton Press v. M. Panchaksharappa (AIR 1962 SC 413) — Easy Case Explainer | The Law Easy

Sivayogeswara Cotton Press v. M. Panchaksharappa

AIR 1962 SC 413

Supreme Court of India 1962 Citation: AIR 1962 SC 413 Lease · Permanency · Tenancy Reading time: ~6 min
```
Author: Gulzar Hashmi Location: India Primary keywords: perpetual lease, permanent tenancy, tenancy at will
Illustration for the case Sivayogeswara Cotton Press v. M. Panchaksharappa
```
```

Quick Summary

Did the lease deed create a permanent tenure or a tenancy at will? The Supreme Court said that a surrender clause for the lessee, exercisable by consent after a fixed period, does not cut down a permanent tenure if the parties otherwise intended permanency. The appeal was allowed and the suit for treating the defendants as tenants at will was dismissed.

Slug: sivayogeswara-cotton-press-v-m-panchaksharappa Publish date: 2025-11-01 Court: Supreme Court of India

Issues

  1. Does the lease deed show a perpetual/permanent grant to the lessee?
  2. Does a surrender option (after 20 years, by mutual consent) defeat the permanency of the tenure?

Rules

  • A lessee can surrender leasehold rights to the lessor by mutual consent, including via a clause permitting surrender after a set period.
  • Such a lessee-friendly clause does not dilute permanent tenure, if the deed otherwise shows an intention to create a permanent grant.

Facts — Timeline

Timeline graphic for Sivayogeswara Cotton Press case

N. J. Gamodia leased ~4.5 acres from Gurupadappa at Devangere to build a Ginning & Pressing Cotton Factory.

Gamodia died in 1916; executors later assigned the lease to Gamodia Factories Ltd. on 27 Nov 1933; rent continued till Gurupadappa’s death in May 1939.

On 30 May 1944, the second defendant assigned leasehold interest to the first defendant. The property included factory buildings and quarters.

After the lessor’s death, his two widows accepted rent. The plaintiff (adopted son) was a minor until about 1949.

The plaintiff issued termination notices claiming (i) tenancy at will arose; and (ii) assignments violated the lease. He sued for a declaration and possession.

The first defendant said the lease was a permanent tenancy. Lower courts ruled against the defendants; the High Court refused certificate for appeal.

The first defendant sought special leave before the Supreme Court.

Arguments

Appellant/Defendants

  • Deed shows an intention to create a permanent tenure for factory use.
  • Surrender clause (after 20 years, by consent) is for lessee’s benefit and does not negate permanency.
  • Assignments were within the lease framework; rent was accepted for years.

Respondent/Plaintiff

  • Lease should be treated as a tenancy at will in the events that happened.
  • Assignments allegedly breached the lease conditions.
  • Sought declaration and possession based on termination notices.

Judgment

Gavel representing judgment
  • Appeal allowed. Decrees of the courts below were set aside; the plaintiff’s suit was dismissed.
  • Permanent tenure affirmed: The presence of a surrender by consent after 20 years does not defeat a lease’s permanent character when the deed intends such permanency.
  • Assignments & conduct: Long acceptance of rent and industrial purpose supported the defence position.

Ratio

A lease can be permanent even if it contains a surrender option for the lessee after a specified period, provided the overall deed reveals an intention to create a permanent tenure. The surrender clause is a benefit and does not erode permanency.

Why It Matters

  • Clarifies that lessee-friendly surrender clauses are compatible with permanent leases.
  • Helps drafters signal intention of permanency without fear of losing it due to a surrender option.
  • Guides courts in reading the deed as a whole and weighing long-term conduct (rent acceptance, industrial setup).

Key Takeaways

  • Permanency depends on intention in the deed, not on the mere presence of a surrender clause.
  • Mutual-consent surrender after a period is a benefit, not a threat, to permanency.
  • Assignments and long acceptance of rent can support the permanent tenure view.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: PERMA–LEASE

  • PERMAPermanent intention in the deed.
  • LELessee’s surrender option by consent.
  • ASEStill Effective permanency despite option.

3-Step Hook: (1) Read deed as a whole → (2) Identify intention of permanency → (3) Treat surrender clause as a benefit, not a breaker.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Does the lease deed create a permanent tenure or a tenancy at will, given the surrender clause?

Rule: Lessee may surrender by mutual consent; this clause does not curb permanency if the deed otherwise intends a permanent grant.

Application: Industrial purpose, assignments, and rent acceptance align with a permanent arrangement; surrender is optional and consensual.

Conclusion: Permanent tenure stands; appeal allowed and plaintiff’s suit dismissed.

Glossary

Permanent Tenure
A lease intended to last indefinitely or without a fixed expiry, subject to terms.
Tenancy at Will
A tenancy that either party can end at any time, with no fixed term.
Surrender
Giving up lease rights to the lessor, generally requiring mutual consent.

FAQs

No. If the deed shows an intention of permanency, a surrender-by-consent option does not defeat that intention.

It supported the inference of a lasting arrangement consistent with a permanent tenure.

No. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit seeking that declaration.

The lessee. It allows giving up the lease by mutual consent after a stated period without harming the tenure’s permanent nature.
```

Reviewed by The Law Easy

Property & Lease Law Permanent Tenure Supreme Court

Comment

Nothing for now