Central Machine Tool Institute v. Assistant Labour Commissioner
1978 SCC OnLine Kar 219 Bench: High Court (Karnataka)
Quick Summary
The Karnataka High Court said the word “industry” in the Trade Unions Act (TUA) should be read like the Industrial Disputes Act (IDA) because both cover labour law. A research body can be an industry even without profit motive if it runs systematic, service-giving activities. So, CMTI staff could form a trade union.
- Core idea: Profit motive is not required; organized services can still be “industry.”
- Result: CMTI counted as an industry; union registration was valid.
Issues
- Does “industry” in TUA match “industry” in IDA?
- Can R&D employees form a union under the TUA?
- Can IDA’s later definition be read into the TUA?
- Does lack of profit motive stop an establishment being an “industry”?
Rules
- Pari materia reading: Where laws share subject and purpose, an unclear term in one may be read using the other.
- No profit motive needed: If there is systematic activity rendering material services, the body can be an “industry.”
Facts (Timeline)
CASE_TITLE- CMTI, an R&D body in Bengaluru, worked on machine tool design, testing, inspection, and methods.
- It was government-funded; internal income was small.
- Employees formed “CMTI Employees’ Association” and sought trade union registration.
- Assistant Labour Commissioner registered the association as a union.
- CMTI objected: “we are not an industry; we are research-only; no profit motive.”
- Cancellation was refused; CMTI filed a writ in the High Court.
Arguments
CMTI (Petitioner)
- Pure research; not engaged in trade/commerce.
- No profit motive; mostly grant-funded.
- TUA “industry” should not follow IDA definition.
Employees/Registrar (Respondents)
- Systematic services: design, testing, consultancy, know-how.
- IDA and TUA are pari materia; use IDA meaning.
- Profit motive is irrelevant to “industry.”
Judgment
Held- Pari materia: “Industry” in TUA is read in line with IDA.
- No profit requirement: Organized services make the body an industry even without profit aim.
- CMTI is an industry: Activities like consultancy, testing, and sales fit IDA’s industrial profile.
- Union valid: Employees were entitled to trade union registration.
Ratio Decidendi
TUA and IDA move in the same labour field; adopt a common meaning of “industry.” Profit motive is not decisive. CMTI’s systematic services brought it within “industry,” enabling union rights.
Why It Matters
- Sets guidance for labs, institutes, and tech bodies on union rights.
- Stops narrow “profit-only” views of industry under labour law.
- Promotes consistent reading across labour statutes.
Key Takeaways
- “Industry” under TUA aligns with IDA.
- Profit motive not essential for being an industry.
- R&D bodies giving organized services can form unions.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook
Mnemonic: “PARI-PROOF” — PARI materia meaning; PROOF of services, not profits.
- Match: Use IDA meaning for TUA.
- Assess: Look for systematic, service activity.
- Decide: If yes, staff are entitled to unionize.
IRAC Outline
Issue
Meaning of “industry” in TUA; union rights of R&D staff; role of profit motive.
Rule
Pari materia with IDA; profit motive not essential if systematic, material services exist.
Application
CMTI’s testing, design, consultancy, and sales show organized services to the community.
Conclusion
CMTI is an industry; union registration stands.
Glossary
- Pari Materia
- A method of reading related statutes together to harmonize meanings.
- Industry
- Under IDA: systematic activity with employer–employee cooperation providing goods/services.
- Profit Motive
- Intention to earn profit; not essential for “industry” in labour law.
FAQs
Related Cases
Share
Related Post
Tags
Archive
Popular & Recent Post
Comment
Nothing for now