• Today: November 01, 2025

Rangaswami v. Registrar of Trade Unions

01 November, 2025
1051
Rangaswami v. Registrar of Trade Unions — Easy Case Explainer | The Law Easy

Rangaswami v. Registrar of Trade Unions

Court: High Court of Madras Jurisdiction: IN Published: 22 Oct 2025 Author: Gulzar Hashmi Labour & Industrial Law ~8 min read

1960 SCC OnLine Mad 243 Bench: Single Judge

Hero image for Rangaswami v. Registrar of Trade Unions

Quick Summary

The Madras Raj Bhavan staff tried to register a trade union. The Registrar refused. The High Court agreed with the Registrar.

  • Main point: Raj Bhavan work is governmental/personal, not a trade or business. So, it is not an “industry” for Trade Unions Act purposes.
  • Extra point: Selling surplus garden produce or old materials is incidental. It does not turn the activity into a business.

Issues

  • Are Raj Bhavan employees engaged in an “industry” for Trade Unions Act registration?
  • Can the Industrial Disputes Act (IDA) and Trade Unions Act (TUA) be treated as one system?
  • Is the employer–employee cooperation test met here?
  • Do sales of surplus produce/unserviceable items amount to trade or business?

Rules

  • “Industry” covers trade, business, manufacture, or an undertaking. It is wider than common trade/business and involves cooperation to achieve a result.
  • For TUA registration, members must be engaged in a trade/business-linked activity.

Facts (Timeline)

CASE_TITLE
  • Raj Bhavan staff formed the “Madras Raj Bhavan Workers’ Union”.
  • On 9 Feb 1959, seven employees applied for TUA registration.
  • Two categories of workers: domestic (pensionable) and non-pensionable (maistries, gardeners) under the Comptroller.
  • Registrar rejected: work not connected with trade/business.
  • Petitioners argued IDA’s broad “industry” definition and pointed to sales of surplus garden produce.
  • Matter went to Madras High Court.
Timeline for Rangaswami case

Arguments

Petitioners (Employees)

  • Work fits IDA Section 2(j) “industry”.
  • Sales of surplus produce add commercial character.
  • Services extend beyond the Governor’s household to guests/visitors.

Registrar (Respondent)

  • TUA needs link with trade or business; services here are personal/governmental.
  • IDA’s broader definition cannot be lifted into TUA without context.
  • Sales are incidental; do not create a business.

Judgment

Held
  • No “industry” for TUA: Raj Bhavan activity is governmental/personal, not trade/business. Registration rightly refused.
  • IDA vs TUA: The broad IDA meaning cannot automatically control TUA registration decisions.
  • Incidental sales: Selling surplus produce/unserviceable items does not change the core non-commercial nature.
  • Result: Petition dismissed; costs imposed.
Judgment illustration for Rangaswami case

Ratio Decidendi

To register under the TUA, employees must be linked to trade or business. Governmental/domestic services at Raj Bhavan do not meet this test. Incidental sales do not alter the character.

Why It Matters

  • Draws a line between public household work and commercial activity.
  • Clarifies that TUA registration needs a business/trade nexus.
  • Guides government establishments on union registration limits.

Key Takeaways

  1. Raj Bhavan staff activity is not trade or business for TUA.
  2. IDA’s broader “industry” cannot control TUA registration alone.
  3. Incidental sales do not make the work commercial.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “GOV-INC”GOVernment work, INcidental sales, Cannot be trade.

  1. Name the setting: Raj Bhavan = government/personal work.
  2. Check the link: Any real trade/business? No.
  3. Conclude: No TUA registration; petition dismissed.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Whether Raj Bhavan staff work amounts to “industry” for TUA registration.

Rule

TUA needs a trade/business connection; IDA’s broad scope is not decisive for TUA.

Application

Services are governmental/personal; sales are incidental; no trade/business core.

Conclusion

Registration refused; petition dismissed with costs.

Glossary

Industry (TUA context)
Activity tied to trade or business, not mere governmental or household service.
Incidental Sales
Occasional sale of surplus items; does not make the activity a business.
Registrar of Trade Unions
Authority that grants or refuses trade union registration.

FAQs

No. They are governmental/personal. So they are outside TUA’s trade/business idea.

Not by itself. TUA has its own requirement: a trade/business nexus for registration.

No. Incidental sales do not convert the activity into a trade or business.

Registration refused. Petition dismissed with costs. Staff could not register under TUA on these facts.
Author: Gulzar Hashmi India 22 Oct 2025
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Rangaswami v. Registrar of Trade Unions rangaswami-v-registrar-of-trade-unions industry; Trade Unions Act; union registration; Raj Bhavan; governmental service Industrial Disputes Act; surplus produce sale; Madras High Court; 1960 SCC OnLine Mad 243 2025-10-22 Gulzar Hashmi India
Labour Law Trade Union Public Service

Comment

Nothing for now