• Today: November 01, 2025

Rohtas Industries v. Union

01 November, 2025
1151
Rohtas Industries v. Union (1976) — Easy Case Explainer | The Law Easy

Rohtas Industries v. Union

Court: Supreme Court of India Jurisdiction: IN Published: 22 Oct 2025 Author: Gulzar Hashmi Labour & Industrial Law ~8 min read

(1976) 2 SCC 82 Bench: Supreme Court

Hero image for Rohtas Industries v. Union

Quick Summary

Workers at Rohtas Industries went on an illegal strike. Arbitrators later asked workers to pay the company for losses. The courts said this was not allowed.

  • Main point: Compensation for strike losses is not an “industrial dispute” under the IDA unless it is part of the referred dispute.
  • Union immunity: Section 18 of the Trade Unions Act protects unions for acts in a trade dispute.

Issues

  • Can a trade union be held liable for damages from an illegal strike?
  • Are employer compensation claims covered by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?
  • Did the arbitrators exceed their jurisdiction by granting compensation?

Rules

  • Unions, as collective bodies, are protected by Section 18, Trade Unions Act for acts in a trade dispute.
  • Employer claims for compensation are not industrial disputes under the IDA, 1947, unless specifically part of the referred dispute.
  • Arbitration under IDA cannot award compensation outside the Act’s scope.

Facts (Timeline)

CASE_TITLE
  • Workers at Rohtas Industries went on strike without following the IDA process; Tribunal declared the strike illegal.
  • Both sides later signed a memorandum to settle the core issues; a Board of Arbitrators (incl. two retired judges) was appointed.
  • Arbitrators awarded compensation to management for strike losses.
  • The union challenged the compensation part; High Court quashed it for lack of jurisdiction.
  • Management appealed to the Supreme Court.
Timeline for Rohtas Industries case

Arguments

Appellant (Management)

  • Illegal strike caused heavy loss; workers should compensate.
  • Arbitrators could grant such relief within the overall dispute.

Respondent (Union)

  • Compensation is outside IDA; not an industrial dispute.
  • Section 18 TUA gives immunity; arbitrators exceeded power.

Judgment

Held
  • No compensation under IDA: Such claims are not industrial disputes unless specifically referred.
  • Arbitrators exceeded jurisdiction: Compensation part of the award is invalid.
  • Union immunity: Section 18 TUA protects unions for acts tied to a trade dispute.
  • Appeal dismissed: High Court order upheld; no costs.
Judgment illustration for Rohtas Industries case

Ratio Decidendi

Employer claims for monetary loss from a strike are generally outside the IDA framework and cannot be granted by IDA arbitration. Union acts in pursuit of a trade dispute enjoy statutory immunity.

Why It Matters

  • Defines clear limits on compensation claims during strikes.
  • Protects collective action while keeping arbitration within the IDA.
  • Guides HR, unions, and tribunals on jurisdiction boundaries.

Key Takeaways

  1. Union not liable to pay strike-loss compensation under IDA.
  2. Arbitrators cannot award compensation beyond the Act.
  3. Section 18 TUA shields unions in trade disputes.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “I-D-A? N-O-P!”IDA can’t award Compensation; Not an industrial dispute; Outside jurisdiction; Protected by TUA §18.

  1. Ask: Is compensation part of the referred dispute?
  2. Check: If not, IDA arbitration has no power.
  3. Conclude: Union immunity applies; no damages.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Union liability for strike losses and IDA power to award compensation.

Rule

IDA covers industrial disputes; compensation not included unless referred; TUA §18 grants immunity.

Application

Compensation claim arose from illegal strike but was not part of the referred dispute; arbitrators overreached.

Conclusion

Compensation direction set aside; union not liable; appeal dismissed.

Glossary

Industrial Dispute
A conflict about employment terms, rights, or conditions recognized by the IDA.
Section 18, TUA
Gives unions immunity for acts done in contemplation/furtherance of a trade dispute.
Illegal Strike
Strike that breaches IDA procedures; still does not create automatic compensation liability under IDA.

FAQs

Not through IDA arbitration, unless the compensation claim is part of the referred industrial dispute.

No. Unions are collective bodies and enjoy TUA §18 immunity for acts in a trade dispute.

They ordered compensation beyond the IDA’s scope, so that part was quashed as ultra vires.

No. While wages during the strike may be denied, broad compensation orders are not supported by the IDA framework.
Author: Gulzar Hashmi India 22 Oct 2025
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Rohtas Industries v. Union rohtas-industries-v-union illegal strike; union liability; compensation; Industrial Disputes Act; arbitration; Trade Unions Act Section 18 Rohtas Industries; Supreme Court of India; (1976) 2 SCC 82; IDA scope; union immunity 2025-10-22 Gulzar Hashmi India
Labour Law Trade Union Industrial Relations

Comment

Nothing for now