• Today: November 01, 2025

Tirumala Tirupati v. Commissioner of Labour

01 November, 2025
1101
Tirumala Tirupati v. Commissioner of Labour — Easy Case Explainer | The Law Easy

Tirumala Tirupati v. Commissioner of Labour

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh Jurisdiction: IN Published: 22 Oct 2025 Author: Gulzar Hashmi Labour & Industrial Law ~9 min read

1977 SCC OnLine AP 103 Bench: High Court (AP)

Hero image for Tirumala Tirupati v. Commissioner of Labour

Quick Summary

TTD is mainly a religious body, so the whole institution is not an “industry.” But some utility-style departments work like industries. Staff in those departments are “workmen” and can register a trade union. TTD could challenge the registration because it affects its employment relations.

  • Dominant Nature Test: Look at the institution’s main character.
  • Triple Test: Systematic activity, services meeting human wants, and employer–employee cooperation.

Issues

  • Can TTD be generally treated as an “industry”?
  • Are its employees “workmen” under labour law?
  • Can they form and register a trade union?
  • Does TTD have locus standi to contest union registration?

Rules

  • Dominant Nature Test: Focus on the main character of the institution and the integrated nature of departments.
  • Triple Test: (a) Systematic activity; (b) service/production that meets human wants; (c) cooperation between employer and employees.
  • Where a specific department meets these tests, it may be treated as an “industry” even if the whole body is religious.

Facts (Timeline)

CASE_TITLE
  • TTD manages major temples; large pilgrim inflow and donations.
  • Workers—especially in Water & Power—sought union registration as “workmen.”
  • Registrar granted registrations in 1970.
  • TTD objected: religious body, not industry; employees not “workmen.”
  • Sec. 10 TUA cancellation sought by TTD; Registrar refused in 1975.
  • TTD filed W.P. No. 840/1976 (Water & Power Union) and W.P. No. 1866/1976 (general employees’ union).
  • TTD argued the Endowments Act governed its staff, not TUA.
Timeline for TTD industry and union registration dispute

Arguments

TTD (Petitioner)

  • TTD is religious; not an “industry.”
  • Employees are governed by Endowments law, not TUA.
  • General staff do not fit “workmen”; registrations erroneous.

Employees/Registrar (Respondents)

  • Utility departments run systematic services like an industry.
  • Such staff are “workmen”; unions validly registered.
  • Dominant/Triple Tests support department-wise industry status.

Judgment

Held
  • Whole institution: TTD is not an industry due to its dominant religious character.
  • Departments: Water/Electricity units satisfy the tests; they are industries.
  • Workmen & Unions: Staff of those departments are workmen and may register unions.
  • Locus standi: TTD can challenge registrations.
  • Result: W.P. 840/1976 dismissed (utility union stands). W.P. 1866/1976 allowed (general union not registrable).
Judgment illustration for TTD industry case

Ratio Decidendi

Use Dominant Nature Test for the institution and Triple Test for activities. A religious body may host departments that are “industries”; their staff are workmen with union rights.

Why It Matters

  • Explains how mixed religious–service institutions are treated under labour law.
  • Confirms department-wise union rights where industrial features exist.
  • Clarifies standing to challenge union registration decisions.

Key Takeaways

  1. TTD overall ≠ industry; utility departments can be.
  2. Department staff with industrial features = workmen.
  3. Such staff may form and register trade unions.
  4. TTD had locus to contest registrations.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “RELi-UTIL”RELigious whole, UTILity parts are industries.

  1. Identify: Whole vs department.
  2. Apply Tests: Dominant Nature + Triple Test.
  3. Decide: Workmen & unions valid where industrial features exist.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Industry status of TTD and its departments; workmen status; union registration; TTD’s locus standi.

Rule

Dominant Nature Test + Triple Test; department-wise analysis under TUA/IDA principles.

Application

Religious core ≠ industry; utilities meet tests; staff = workmen; unions valid; TTD may challenge.

Conclusion

Utility union stands; general union disallowed; mixed character recognized.

Glossary

Dominant Nature Test
Checks the main character of a multi-activity body and how departments integrate.
Triple Test
Looks for systematic activity, service/production meeting human wants, and employer–employee cooperation.
Locus Standi
Right to bring a challenge because one is directly affected.

FAQs

No. Only specific service departments with industrial features may qualify as industries.

Yes—where their department functions like an industry, those workers are “workmen” and can register unions.

Because the whole TTD is not an industry; only certain departments meet the tests.

Yes. It directly affects TTD’s employment structure, so it had standing to challenge.
Author: Gulzar Hashmi India 22 Oct 2025
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Tirumala Tirupati v. Commissioner of Labour tirumala-tirupati-v-commissioner-of-labour industry test; Dominant Nature Test; Triple Test; workmen; union registration; TTD locus standi; Trade Unions Act; Industrial Disputes Act; Andhra Pradesh High Court; 1977 SCC OnLine AP 103 2025-10-22 Gulzar Hashmi India
Labour Law Trade Union Religious Institutions

Comment

Nothing for now