• Today: November 01, 2025

Dharangadhara Chemical Works Ltd v. State of Saurashtra (AIR 1957 SC 264)

01 November, 2025
1551
Dharangadhara Chemical Works v. State of Saurashtra — Are Agarias “Workmen”? (AIR 1957 SC 264)
LegalCase India Labour & Industrial Law ~9 min read

Dharangadhara Chemical Works Ltd v. State of Saurashtra (AIR 1957 SC 264)

Supreme Court of India 1957 AIR 1957 SC 264 Gulzar Hashmi 23 Oct 2025
Hero image for Dharangadhara Chemical Works case explainer

Quick Summary

Main Question: Were the agarias (salt workers) independent contractors or workmen under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?

Answer: Workmen. The Supreme Court said the company’s control over how salt was produced (methods, quality checks) showed an employer–employee link.

Issues

  • Are agarias contractors or workmen considering the company’s supervision?
  • What elements define a master–servant relationship for seasonal, piece-rate salt work?

Rules

Control test: Beyond “what” is to be done, look at “how” it is done. Supervision, process control, and quality checks point to an employment relationship. Degree of control varies by industry.

Facts (Timeline)

Simple Timeline
Company held lease/licence to make salt in Saurashtra; hired seasonal agarias.
Season: Oct–Jun. Workers returned home off-season; same plot (patta) often re-allotted yearly.
Advance of ₹400 per patta; balance paid per maund at fixed rate (5 annas 6 pies).
Agarias could use family/extra helpers; company checked brine density, plot prep, crystal formation, and final testing.
Industrial Tribunal: agarias are workmen. LAT: agreed. HC (Saurashtra): agreed; certificate granted.
Supreme Court: reviewed control over methods/quality vs flexible hours/seasonal features.
Timeline for Dharangadhara Chemical Works v. State of Saurashtra

Arguments

Company (Appellant)

  • Agarias are independent contractors with freedom over hours and helpers.
  • We only buy output at a fixed rate; no strict control over labour practice.

Workmen/State (Respondents)

  • Company dictates how salt is made via process & quality checks.
  • Advances, fixed rates, and staged supervision show an employment link.

Judgment

The Supreme Court affirmed that agarias are workmen under the ID Act. The decisive factor was the company’s method-level control—brine tests, plot prep, crystal formation, and final quality checks—showing supervision over how work was done.

Judgment visual for Dharangadhara Chemical Works case

Ratio Decidendi

How over what: Employer control over the manner of production, plus staged supervision and quality control, establishes an employer–employee relationship even with seasonal, piece-rate work.

Why It Matters

  • Protects seasonal and piece-rate workers when process control is with the principal.
  • Shows flexible hours do not defeat workman status if method control exists.
  • Guides industries with process-heavy supervision (e.g., salt, mining, food processing).

Key Takeaways

Control Decides

Supervision of how work is done signals employment.

Piece-Rate ≠ Contractor

Payment method alone doesn’t determine status.

Seasonal Still Covered

Seasonality and flexible hours don’t negate control.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “HOW = Hired”

  1. Map the Method: Who controls process & quality?
  2. Follow the Flow: Advances, rates, plot allocation.
  3. Weigh Seasonality: Flexibility ≠ lack of control.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Are agarias workmen under the ID Act?

Rule: Control over how work is performed (process/quality supervision) indicates employment; industry context matters.

Application: Company supervised brine density, plot prep, crystal formation, and final testing; advances and fixed rates structured the relationship.

Conclusion: Agarias are workmen; Industrial Tribunal’s jurisdiction upheld.

Glossary

Agaria
A traditional salt worker engaged in seasonal salt production.
Control Test
Legal test focusing on who controls the manner of work.
Patta
Allocated plot of land used for salt production.

Student FAQs

Control over the method of work = employment, even with seasonality and piece-rate pay.

Not enough to deny employment, because the company controlled how salt was produced.

No. Pay method is only one factor; control and supervision are key.

Because systematic quality control shows process supervision, a hallmark of employer control.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Labour Law Industrial Disputes Act Workman Test Control & Supervision
Back to Top

Comment

Nothing for now