• Today: November 01, 2025

The Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Their Workmen — AIR 1960 SC 692

01 November, 2025
1151
The Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Their Workmen (1960) — Minimum Wages & Dearness Allowance Explained

The Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Their Workmen — AIR 1960 SC 692

Do statutory minimum wages trump private wage deals, and must DA be counted while fixing minimum wages?

Citation: AIR 1960 SC 692 Supreme Court Labour • Minimum Wages ~7 min read India
Author: Gulzar Hashmi Published: Keywords: Minimum Wages Act, dearness allowance, industry standard
Hero image for Bijay Cotton Mills case explainer on minimum wages and DA

Quick Summary

Workers said their pay was below survival level. The company relied on a private deal. The Court said: when fixing minimum wages, statutory notifications under the Minimum Wages Act are strong guides and can be preferred over private bargains.

Also, dearness allowance (DA) must be looked at along with basic pay to reflect real earnings. Final figure approved: ₹30 basic + ₹10 DA per month.

Issues

  • Do Minimum Wages Act notifications prevail over a lower wage agreement?
  • Should DA be counted while fixing minimum wages based on industry standards?

Rules

  • Statutory notifications under the Minimum Wages Act offer authoritative guidance for basic pay.
  • Industry-standard comparisons must include basic + DA to capture true earnings.
  • Private bargains cannot defeat the minimum floor aimed at worker subsistence.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline: tribunal awards, appellate remand, statutory minima used, Supreme Court dismissal
Dispute: Workers sought fixation of minimum wages; claimed subsistence shortfall.
Tribunal (1st): Initially declined due to regional economic concerns.
LAT Remand: Directed Tribunal to fix wages after reconsideration.
Tribunal (2nd): Fixed ₹25 basic + ₹10 DA, using local industry standards (but didn’t factor DA properly in comparison).
LAT (Final): Set ₹30 basic + ₹10 DA using a statutory Minimum Wages notification.
Supreme Court: Dismissed company’s appeal; upheld ₹30 + ₹10 and clarified role of DA and statutory guidance.

Arguments

Appellant: Mill

  • Private agreement pegged minimum at ₹27; should bind the parties.
  • Industry standards warranted ₹25 basic (with separate DA).
  • Statutory minima should not automatically override local economics.

Respondents: Workmen

  • Pay below subsistence; statutory Minimum Wages must guide fixation.
  • DA must count with basic to reflect actual take-home value.
  • ₹30 + ₹10 aligns with the statutory floor and industry realities.

Judgment

The Supreme Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal’s award of ₹30 basic + ₹10 DA. Notifications under the Minimum Wages Act may be relied on in fixing basic wages despite contrary agreements.

The Court clarified that DA must be considered alongside basic pay when comparing industry standards, to present a full picture of earnings.

Judgment visual: Supreme Court prefers statutory minima, includes DA in wage comparison

Ratio Decidendi

When fixing minimum wages, statutory minima are the preferred guide. Industry standard comparisons must include DA with basic, not basic alone.

Why It Matters

  • Confirms that minimum wages are a floor, not a bargaining chip.
  • Promotes real-income assessment by counting DA.
  • Guides tribunals to align awards with statutory policy plus industry practice.

Key Takeaways

  • Statutory Minimum Wages notifications can override lower private agreements.
  • DA is integral to wage comparison; do not assess basic pay in isolation.
  • Award of ₹30 basic + ₹10 DA sustained; appeal dismissed.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “MINIMUM = MWA + INDUSTRY + DA”

  1. Check Floor: Look at the Minimum Wages Act notification.
  2. Compare: Test with industry standard (basic plus DA).
  3. Fix: Choose the figure that protects subsistence and policy aims.

IRAC Outline

Issue Rule Application Conclusion
Does statutory minimum wage beat a lower private deal? Minimum Wages notifications guide/prevail in fixing basic pay. LAT relied on notification to set ₹30 basic. Statutory guide preferred; private deal at ₹27 not controlling.
Must DA be counted in industry comparisons? Yes—use basic + DA for real earnings. Tribunal’s earlier omission corrected; ₹30 + ₹10 upheld. Appeal dismissed; award stands.

Glossary

Minimum Wage
Statutory floor to secure subsistence; set via government notification.
Dearness Allowance (DA)
Allowance to offset inflation; must be counted with basic pay for real-income comparison.
Industry Standard
Prevailing wages in comparable establishments/region, used as a benchmark.

FAQs

No. Statutory notifications under the Minimum Wages Act prevail for setting the minimum.

Because DA reflects inflation; including it shows workers’ true earnings.

₹30 as basic wage and ₹10 as DA per month.

No formula—only principles: use statutory floor and include DA in industry comparisons.

Comment

Nothing for now