• Today: October 31, 2025

entores-v-miles-far-east-corporation-communication-of-acceptance

31 October, 2025
1651
Entores v. Miles Far East Corporation explained | Communication of acceptance in telex

Entores v. Miles Far East Corporation (Communication of Acceptance)

Contract Law Court of Appeal (EW) 1955 Citation: [1955] 2 QB Bench: Denning LJ Reading time: ~4 min
Author: Gulzar Hashmi | India | Published on
Telex/instant communication concept for Entores v Miles


Quick Summary

Entores in London sent an offer by telex to a company in Amsterdam. The Dutch company sent back a telex accepting the offer. The deal later failed. The court said: for instant messages like telex, acceptance works when received, not when sent. So the contract formed in London, and English law applied.

Issues

  • Was acceptance complete in London or Amsterdam?
  • Which law should govern—English law or Dutch law?

Rules

  • Acceptance must be communicated before a contract is enforceable.
  • For instantaneous communications (telex/phone), acceptance is effective on receipt, not dispatch.
  • The postal rule does not apply to instant methods.
Exam Tip: Place of receipt = place where contract is made → governs jurisdiction/law.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline visual for Entores v Miles facts
Offer: Entores (London) offered to buy 100 tons of copper cathodes by telex.
Acceptance: Miles Far East (Amsterdam) sent a telex accepting.
Breach: The defendants did not complete the contract.
Claim: Entores sued for damages in England.

Arguments

Appellant (Entores)
  • Acceptance was received in London → contract in London → English law applies.
  • Postal rule is not for telex; it is for post.
Respondent (Miles Far East)
  • Acceptance was sent from Amsterdam → contract there → Dutch law should apply.
  • Try to extend postal rule to telex dispatch.

Judgment (Held)

Judgment concept for Entores v Miles

The Court of Appeal held that the postal rule does not apply to telex. Acceptance is effective when received by the offeror. So the contract was made in London, and English law applied.

  • Instant methods (telex/telephone) → acceptance on receipt.
  • Place of contract = place of receipt.

Ratio Decidendi

Communication must reach the offeror for acceptance to be complete in instantaneous communications. Dispatch is not enough.

Why It Matters

  • Guides email, fax, chats, and other instant methods.
  • Fixes jurisdiction when parties are in different countries.
  • Keeps contract law consistent with real-time messaging.

Key Takeaways

  • Postal rule ≠ instant communications.
  • Acceptance effective on receipt.
  • Place of receipt decides governing law and court.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “RING = Received Is New Ground”
  • Received message seals the deal.
  • Is where the contract forms.
  • New Ground: postal rule set aside for instant tech.
3-Step Exam Hook
  1. Identify the medium: post vs instant?
  2. If instant → acceptance on receipt.
  3. Locate receipt → choose law/jurisdiction.

IRAC Outline

Issue

Was the acceptance complete in London or Amsterdam, and which law applies?

Rule

For instantaneous communications, acceptance is complete on receipt. Postal rule does not apply.

Application

The telex accepting Entores’ offer was received in London. Thus, communication was complete there.

Conclusion

Contract formed in London; English law applied.

Glossary

Instantaneous Communication
Real-time methods like telex/telephone/chat. Acceptance is effective on receipt.
Postal Rule
Dispatch rule for post: acceptance complete when letter is posted—not used for instant methods.
Jurisdiction
Legal power of a court; here linked to where acceptance is received.

FAQs

Acceptance via telex is effective on receipt, not when sent. Postal rule does not apply.

Entores Ltd (London) and Miles Far East Corporation (Amsterdam) dealing in copper cathodes.

It guides modern instant communications like email or messaging: the contract forms where acceptance is received.

If the offeror knows the message did not get through, there is no contract until a clear acceptance is received.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Contract Communication Acceptance
```

SEO Fields

CASE_TITLE: Entores v. Miles Far East Corporation (Communication of Acceptance)

PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: Entores v Miles Far East, communication of acceptance, instantaneous communication rule

SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: telex acceptance, postal rule exception, jurisdiction, [1955] 2 QB

PUBLISH_DATE: 2025-10-26

AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi

LOCATION: India

Slug: entores-v-miles-far-east-corporation-communication-of-acceptance

Canonical: https://thelaweasy.com/entores-v-miles-far-east-corporation-communication-of-acceptance/

Comment

Nothing for now